Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Aug:99:103008.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103008. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Maternal positioning with flexed thighs to correct foetal occipito-posterior position in labour: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Maternal positioning with flexed thighs to correct foetal occipito-posterior position in labour: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nigel Lee et al. Midwifery. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Foetal occipto-posterior position during labour can contribute to negative outcomes. Encouraging women to adopt positions utilising thigh flexion with the aim of increasing pelvic diameters and promoting foetal rotation to the occpito-anterior position are often used. However, the efficacy of these strategies has not yet been determined.

Objective: To compare the effects of maternal hands and knees or lateral positions with flexed thighs versus control in rotating foetal occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior in the first stage of labour.

Methods: The databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase were searched with dates ranging from 1947 to 2019. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared maternal hands and knees, and lateral positions incorporating flexed thighs (spine-femur angle of ≥ 90°) versus control to rotate foetal malposition in the first stage of labour and published in English. Methodological quality was assessed based on Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 for randomized controlled trials. Two teams of researchers completed the study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and meta-analysis.

Results: Seven RCTs met our inclusion criteria (n = 1422). Whilst there was an increase in the rate of spontaneous foetal rotation from the occipito-posterior to the anterior position, particularly in the first hour after the intervention was adopted, this did not reach statistical significance (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.96-1.39, p = 0.13). The effect was insufficient to influence rates of spontaneous vaginal birth (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85-1.26, p = 0.72) whilst there was a reduction in the duration of first stage labour (Mean-difference, -27.34; 95% CI, -45.96, -8.72, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: This systematic review reports no significant correlation between maternal positioning with flexed thighs and foetal rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior position during first stage labour. The specific maternal positions tested did not impact on the majority of other labour and birth outcomes. Given that the majority of fetuses will rotate spontaneously to an occipito-anterior position it may be that maternal posturing facilitates earlier rotation in this group but has no effect on the subset of infants that would otherwise persist in the occipito-posterior position to birth.

Keywords: First stage labour; Foetal position; Maternal position; Meta-analysis; Occipito-posterior position; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no conflicts of interests. Completed disclosure of interest forms are provided as supporting information.