Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan
- PMID: 33896270
- PMCID: PMC8191170
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211005655
Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan
Abstract
Objective: Shared decision making (SDM) tools can help implement guideline recommendations for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) considering stroke prevention strategies. We sought to characterize all available SDM tools for this purpose and examine their quality and clinical impact.
Methods: We searched through multiple bibliographic databases, social media, and an SDM tool repository from inception to May 2020 and contacted authors of identified SDM tools. Eligible tools had to offer information about warfarin and ≥1 direct oral anticoagulant. We extracted tool characteristics, assessed their adherence to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, and obtained information about their efficacy in promoting SDM.
Results: We found 14 SDM tools. Most tools provided up-to-date information about the options, but very few included practical considerations (e.g., out-of-pocket cost). Five of these SDM tools, all used by patients prior to the encounter, were tested in trials at high risk of bias and were found to produce small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict.
Conclusion: Several SDM tools for stroke prevention in AF are available, but whether they promote high-quality SDM is yet to be known. The implementation of guidelines for SDM in this context requires user-centered development and evaluation of SDM tools that can effectively promote high-quality SDM and improve stroke prevention in patients with AF.
Keywords: anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; cardiovascular prevention; decision aids; shared decision making.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The investigators Juan P. Brito, Ian G. Hargraves, Victor M. Montori, and Peter A. Noseworthy participated in the development of the Anticoagulation Choice, which is one of the shared decision making tools included in this review. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32897386 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Mar 3;21(2):97-106. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab085. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022. PMID: 34550376
-
Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 18;11(2):e023048. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023048. Epub 2022 Jan 13. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35023356 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28962662 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: navigating complex issues in partnership with the patient.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;56(2):159-163. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0465-5. Epub 2018 Oct 17. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30327992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Obesity: An Instagram Analysis.Cureus. 2023 May 28;15(5):e39619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39619. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37388585 Free PMC article.
-
Oral anticoagulants: a systematic overview of reviews on efficacy and safety, genotyping, self-monitoring, and stakeholder experiences.Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 28;11(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02098-w. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36303235 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Complementary Encounter and Patient Decision Aids for Shared Decision Making about Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jun 21;8(1):23814683231178033. doi: 10.1177/23814683231178033. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2023. PMID: 38178866 Free PMC article.
-
"It's a mess sometimes": patient perspectives on provider responses to healthcare costs, and how informatics interventions can help support cost-sensitive care decisions.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac010. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35182148 Free PMC article.
-
Design and development of a digital shared decision-making tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.JAMIA Open. 2023 Feb 2;6(1):ooad003. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad003. eCollection 2023 Apr. JAMIA Open. 2023. PMID: 36751465 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bjorck S, Palaszewski B, Friberg L, Bergfeldt L. Atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, and warfarin therapy revisited: a population-based study. Stroke. 2013;44(11):3103–8. - PubMed
-
- Lip G, Lane D. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;313(19):1950–62. - PubMed
-
- Lloyd-Jones D, Wang T, Leip E, et al.. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–6. - PubMed
-
- Miller P, Andersson F, Kalra L. Are cost benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation underestimated? Stroke. 2005;36(2):360–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical