Does diagnostic accuracy of surgeon's perception outweigh frozen section analysis in determining intraoperative clear mucosal surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients?
- PMID: 33897178
- PMCID: PMC8051670
- DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_50_20
Does diagnostic accuracy of surgeon's perception outweigh frozen section analysis in determining intraoperative clear mucosal surgical margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients?
Abstract
Introduction: The lucrativeness of the frozen section for intraoperative margin assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is debatable till date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether surgeon's perception by gross examination (GE) of margin is an alternative to frozen section.
Aim: The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of surgeon's perception of tumor-free mucosal and soft-tissue surgical margins intraoperatively assessed by GE and frozen section analysis (FSA).
Methodology: A prospective, observational study was conducted on 59 histologically proven cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Two hundred and thirty-six mucosal margins were assessed by an experienced surgeon (ES) and thereafter subjected subsequently to FSA. These results were compared with the gold standard histopathology (HPE). The sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP), positive predictor value (PPV), negative predictor value (NPV), and DA of surgeon's perception by GE were calculated and subsequently compared with FSA and HPE using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The SS, SP, PPV, NPV, and DA of ES by GE were 80%, 99.12%, 80%, 99.12%, and 98.30%, respectively when compared to HPE, and the SS of 90%, SP of 98.32%, PPV, NPV, and DA were 69.23%, 99.57%, and 97.98%, respectively when compared with HPE. The results of the surgeon's perception by GE were comparable to the results of FSA.
Conclusion: The study concludes that surgeon's perception by GE is upfront reliable alternative intraoperative method to FSA in places where FS is not available.
Keywords: Frozen section; gross examination; oral squamous cell carcinoma; surgical margin.
Copyright: © 2020 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Frozen Section Analysis and Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Surgical Specimen Oriented on 3D Printed Tongue Model to Assess Surgical Margins in Oral Tongue Carcinoma: Preliminary Results.Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 9;11:735002. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.735002. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34956865 Free PMC article.
-
Toluidine blue versus frozen section for assessment of mucosal tumor margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1147. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07644-0. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 33238944 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative gross examination vs frozen section for achievement of adequate margin in oral cancer surgery.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 May;123(5):544-549. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Dec 7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28159583
-
Intraoperative pathology consultation during urological surgery: Impact on final margin status and pitfalls of frozen section diagnosis.Pathol Int. 2021 Sep;71(9):567-580. doi: 10.1111/pin.13132. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Pathol Int. 2021. PMID: 34154033 Review.
-
Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Improve Surgical Resection Margins of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;15(3):896. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030896. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36765858 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hingnikar P, Bhola N, Jadhav A, Wankhade A, Mishra A, Agrawal A. Evaluation of safe surgical mucosal margins with and without intra-operative vital staining with toluidine blue in cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma – A comparative study. BAOJ Cancer Res Ther. 2018;4:59.
-
- Anderson CR, Sisson K, Moncrieff M. A meta-analysis of margin size and local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:464–9. - PubMed
-
- Mitchell DA, Kanatas A, Murphy C, Chengot P, Smith AB, Ong TK. Margins and survival in oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:820–9. - PubMed
-
- Wong LS, McMahon J, Devine J, McLellan D, Thompson E, Farrow A, et al. Influence of close resection margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:102–8. - PubMed
-
- Németh Z, Velich N, Bogdan S, Ujpál M, Szabó G, Suba ZS. The prognostic role of clinical, morphological and molecular markers in oral squamous cell tumors. Neoplasma. 2005;52:95–102. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources