Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 19;8(2):137-147.
doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa068. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Psychometric validity and reliability of the Danish version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module

Affiliations

Psychometric validity and reliability of the Danish version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module

Karin Piil et al. Neurooncol Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The complexity of disease- and treatment-related symptoms causes profound distress and deterioration of health-related quality of life among patients with brain tumors. Currently, there is no Danish validated disease-specific instrument that focuses solely on measures of both neurologic and cancer-related symptoms of patients with brain tumors. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) is a validated patient self-report questionnaire that measures symptom prevalence, intensity, and interference with daily life. The aim of the present study was to determine the psychometric validity of the Danish translation of the MDASI-BT, and to test its utility in 3 cohorts of Danish patients across the spectrum of the brain cancer disease and treatment trajectory.

Methods: A linguistic validation process was conducted. Danish patients with malignant primary brain tumors were included to establish the psychometric validity and reliability of the Danish MDASI-BT. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to support the psychometric properties.

Results: A total of 120 patients participated in this study. Coefficient αs for the symptom and interference subscales indicate a high level of reliability across all items. Corresponding symptom and interference or functional items and subscales in the MDASI-BT and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Module BN20 were significantly correlated. Cognitive debriefing provided evidence for content validity and questionnaire utility as participants were comfortable answering the questions and had no problem with the understandability or number of questions asked.

Conclusion: The MDASI-BT is a simple, concise symptom assessment tool useful for assessing the symptom severity and interference of Danish-speaking patients with brain cancer.

Keywords: The MD Anderson Symptom inventory; brain tumor; cognitive debriefing; concurrent validity; psychometric validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis With Dendrogram Using Ward’s Method of Clustering and Squared Euclidian Distance as Distance Measure for Core Plus Module Items.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, et al. . CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(suppl_4):iv1–iv86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen S, Nielsen J, Laursen RJ, et al. . The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):425. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. . The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–820. - PubMed
    1. Kruchko C, Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, et al. . The CBTRUS story: providing accurate population-based statistics on brain and other central nervous system tumors for everyone. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(3):295–298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rooney AG, Brown PD, Reijneveld JC, et al. . Depression in glioma: a primer for clinicians and researchers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(2):230–235. - PubMed