Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 23;13(3):e14062.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.14062.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injection for Lumbar Spondylosis and Sacroiliac Arthropathy: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Affiliations
Review

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injection for Lumbar Spondylosis and Sacroiliac Arthropathy: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

Jeremiah F Ling et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

This systematic review compares clinical outcomes between platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lumbar spondylosis and sacroiliac arthropathy. A systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the Pubmed, SCOPUS, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. All level I-III evidence comparative studies published in the English language investigating the clinical outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lumbar spondylosis and sacroiliac arthropathy were included. Five studies (242 patients, 114 PRP, 128 corticosteroid) were analyzed. One randomized study was level I evidence, two randomized studies were level II, and two non-randomized studies were level III. Final follow-up ranged from six weeks to six months. Four studies found that both PRP and corticosteroid treatment led to a statistically significant reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS). One found that only the PRP group led to a statistically significant reduction in VAS. Three studies found more significant improvements in one or more clinical outcome scores among PRP patients as compared with corticosteroid patients at the three- to six-month follow-up. Two studies found no difference in outcome score improvements between the two groups at six- to 12-week follow-up. There were no reports of major complications. There were no significant differences in minor complication rates between the two groups. In conclusion, both PRP and corticosteroid injections are safe and effective options for the treatment of lumbar spondylosis and sacroiliac arthropathy. There is some evidence that PRP injection is a more effective option at long-term follow-up compared with corticosteroid injection. Further randomized controlled trials with longer-term follow-up are necessary to compare its long-term efficacy.

Keywords: corticosteroid; injection; lumbar spondylosis; pain management; platelet-rich plasma; sacroiliac arthropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Takashi Hirase was supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Physician-Scientist Institutional Award to the Texas A&M University Academy of Physician Scientists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flowchart showing the application of selection criteria to the studies identified with the search strategy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:299. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology of low back pain in adults. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Hirsch JA. Neuromodulation. 201417;2:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Prevalence of low back pain, seeking medical care, and lost time due to low back pain among manual material handling workers in the United States. Ferguson SA, Merryweather A, Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Lu M-L, Kapellusch JM, Marras WS. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. Katz JN. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 200688;2:21–24. - PubMed
    1. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:251–258. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources