Quarantine acceptance and adherence: qualitative evidence synthesis and conceptual framework
- PMID: 33898163
- PMCID: PMC8051932
- DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01544-8
Quarantine acceptance and adherence: qualitative evidence synthesis and conceptual framework
Abstract
Aim: Emergent infectious diseases often lack medical treatment or preventive vaccines, thus requiring non-pharmaceutical interventions such as quarantine to reduce disease transmission. Quarantine, defined as the separation and restriction of movement of healthy people who have potentially been exposed to the disease, remains contentious especially when the risks and benefits are not fully discussed and not effectively communicated to the people by the organizations who impose this public health measure.
Subject and methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted to examine the phenomenon of adherence to quarantine focused on the following questions: What strategies affect adherence to quarantine? What are the barriers and facilitators to quarantine acceptance? What benefits and harms of quarantine have been described or measured?
Results: The evidence synthesis produced 18 findings assessed with high confidence. The findings were used to construct a conceptual framework for inter- and within-organization coordination and public communication that includes the following topics for consideration: desired orientation for implementation; population demographics; perceptions of messages; prior acceptance of quarantine; likelihood of impacts of quarantine; perceptions of health infrastructure; and perceptions of policy importance.
Conclusion: The findings and conceptual framework can guide development of effective non-pharmaceutical interventions and as such have direct relevance to public health policy and decision-making for intervening in emergent infectious diseases outbreak such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: Conceptual framework; Infectious disease pandemic; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Public health quarantine; Qualitative evidence synthesis.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestAll authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aiello AE, Coulborn RM, Aragon TJ, Baker MG, Burrus BB, Cowling BJ, Duncan A, Enanoria W, Fabian MP, Ferng Y, Larson EL, Leung GM, Markel H, Milton DK, Monto AS, Morse SS, Navarro JA, Park SY, Priest P, Stebbins S, Stern AM, Uddin M, Wetterhall SF, Vukotich CJ. Research findings from nonpharmaceutical intervention studies for pandemic influenza and current gaps in the research. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(4):251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Apenhorst DK, Rasmussen J, Bellows-Mahler SJ, Dalton M, Barth JE, Siple M. Reducing isolation burden—infection prevention and control initiated flag removal process. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(8):S3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.138. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources