Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;3(3):100256.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100256. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Treatment of NAFLD with intermittent calorie restriction or low-carb high-fat diet - a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Treatment of NAFLD with intermittent calorie restriction or low-carb high-fat diet - a randomised controlled trial

Magnus Holmer et al. JHEP Rep. .

Abstract

Background & aims: The first-line treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is weight reduction. Several diets have been proposed, with various effects specifically on liver steatosis. This trial compared the effects of intermittent calorie restriction (the 5:2 diet) and a low-carb high-fat diet (LCHF) on reduction of hepatic steatosis.

Methods: We conducted an open-label randomised controlled trial that included 74 patients with NAFLD randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to 12 weeks' treatment with either a LCHF or 5:2 diet, or general lifestyle advice from a hepatologist (standard of care; SoC). The primary outcome was reduction of hepatic steatosis as measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Secondary outcomes included transient elastography, insulin resistance, blood lipids, and anthropometrics.

Results: The LCHF and 5:2 diets were both superior to SoC treatment in reducing steatosis (absolute reduction: LCHF: -7.2% [95% CI = -9.3 to -5.1], 5:2: -6.1% [95% CI = -8.1 to -4.2], SoC: -3.6% [95% CI = -5.8 to -1.5]) and body weight (LCHF: -7.3 kg [95% CI = -9.6 to -5.0]; 5:2: -7.4 kg [95% CI = -8.7 to -6.0]; SoC: -2.5 kg [95% CI =-3.5 to -1.5]. There was no difference between 5:2 and LCHF (p = 0.41 for steatosis and 0.78 for weight). Liver stiffness improved in the 5:2 and SoC but not in the LCHF group. The 5:2 diet was associated with reduced LDL levels and was tolerated to a higher degree than LCHF.

Conclusions: The LCHF and 5:2 diets were more effective in reducing steatosis and body weight in patients with NAFLD than SoC, suggesting dietary advice can be tailored to meet individual preferences.

Lay summary: For a person with obesity who suffers from fatty liver, weight loss through diet can be an effective treatment to improve the condition of the liver. Many popular diets that are recommended for weight reduction, such as high-fat diets and diets based on intermittent fasting, have not had their effects on the liver directly evaluated. This study shows that both a low-carb high-fat and the 5:2 diet are effective in treating fatty liver caused by obesity.

Clinical trials registration: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03118310).

Keywords: 5:2 diet; ALA, α-linolenic acid; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; CT, computed tomography; Diet treatment; E%, energy percent; EoT, end of treatment; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ICR, intermittent calorie restriction; IR, insulin resistance; ITT, intention-to-treat analysis; Intermittent calorie restriction; LCHF, low-carb high-fat diet; Low-carb-high fat (LCHF); MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NNR, Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; Obesity; PP, per protocol analysis; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs, saturated fatty acids; SoC, standard of care; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; low-CHO, low-carbohydrate diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of screening and inclusion of participants.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in liver steatosis. (A) Boxplot showing MR fat percent at baseline and at end of treatment, per group: SoC: −3.6% (95% CI = −5.8 to −1.5); 5:2: −6.1% (95% CI = −8.1 to −4.2); LCHF: −7.2% (95% CI = −9.3 to −5.1). ∗,∗∗p values for change within each group from baseline to end of treatment. p values at brackets, significance for between-group comparison with linear mixed model. (B) Relative change in MR fat from baseline to end of treatment, per group. ∗,∗∗p values for change within group with linear mixed model. 5:2, the 5:2 diet; LCHF, the low-carb high-fat diet; MR, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; SoC, standard of care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Younossi Z.M., Koenig A.B., Abdelatif D., Fazel Y., Henry L., Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease – meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. - PubMed
    1. Bellentani S., Saccoccio G., Masutti F., Croce L.S., Brandi G., Sasso F. Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatic steatosis in Northern Italy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:112–117. - PubMed
    1. Hagstrom H., Nasr P., Ekstedt M., Hammar U., Stal P., Hultcrantz Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2017;67(6):1265–1273. - PubMed
    1. Friedman S.L., Neuschwander-Tetri B.A., Rinella M., Sanyal A.J. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2018;24:908–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zelber-Sagi S., Nitzan-Kaluski D., Goldsmith R., Webb M., Blendis L., Halpern Z. Long term nutritional intake and the risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a population based study. J Hepatol. 2007;47:711–717. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources