Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 May 1;47(5):668-671.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003006.

Moisture Response Films Versus the Starch Iodine Test for the Detection of Palmar Hyperhidrosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Moisture Response Films Versus the Starch Iodine Test for the Detection of Palmar Hyperhidrosis

Waseem Shehadeh et al. Dermatol Surg. .

Abstract

Background: The starch iodine test (SIT) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool for primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH).

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of a novel approach for the detection of PPH by moisture response films (MRF) in comparison to the SIT.

Methods: This prospective comparative study of the 2 tests was conducted on 17 patients with PPH. Disease severity was evaluated by the SIT and the MRF methods during 4 sessions (twice before and twice after botulinum toxin [BTX] injections) on different days and by different investigators. The physician's global assessment (PGA) scoring of the comparable visual results was evaluated by 2 blinded independent dermatologists. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) scores of the patients at baseline and after the BTX injections were correlated with the SIT and MRF results.

Results: The objective PGA scoring of the SIT results demonstrated poor correlation, whereas the objective PGA scoring of the MRF results correlated highly with the patients' HDSS scores both at baseline and after the BTX injections.

Conclusion: Analysis of palmar hyperhidrosis by means of MRF was superior to SIT and was demonstrated to be more efficient, convenient, and accurate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fujimoto T. Pathophysiology and treatment of hyperhidrosis. Perspiration Res 2016;51:86–93.
    1. Hurley HJ. Glands: structure and function. Biol Skin 2001;5:47.
    1. Hashmonai M, Cameron AE, Connery CP, Perin N, et al. The etiology of primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review. Clin Auton Res 2017;27:379–83.
    1. Xu LI, Rong CH, Tu YR, Min LI, et al. Epidemiological survey of primary palmar hyperhidrosis in adolescents. Chin Med J 2007;120:2215–7.
    1. Strutton DR, Kowalski JW, Glaser DA, Stang PE. US prevalence of hyperhidrosis and impact on individuals with axillary hyperhidrosis: results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:241–8.

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources