Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 1;27(3):261-268.
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000829.

Circulating biomarkers to assess cardiovascular function in critically ill

Affiliations
Review

Circulating biomarkers to assess cardiovascular function in critically ill

Dirk van Lier et al. Curr Opin Crit Care. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Circulatory shock is one of the most common reasons for ICU admission. Mortality rates in excess of 40% necessitate the rapid identification of high-risk patients, as well as the early assessment of effects of initiated treatments. There is an unmet medical need for circulating biomarkers that may improve patient stratification, predict responses to treatment interventions and may even be a target for novel therapies, enabling a better biological rationale to personalize therapy.

Recent findings: Apart from established biomarkers such as lactate, ScvO2 or NT-pro-BNP, novel biomarkers, including adrenomedullin, angiopoietins, angiotensin I/II ratios, renin and DPP3 show promise, as they are all associated with well defined, therapeutically addressable molecular pathways that are dysregulated during circulatory shock. Although some of the therapies related to these biomarkers are still in preclinical stages of development, they may represent personalized treatment opportunities for patients in circulatory shock.

Summary: From a molecular perspective, shock represents a highly heterologous syndrome, in which multiple unique pathways are dysregulated. Assessment of the status of these pathways with circulating biomarkers may provide a unique opportunity to detect specific phenotypes and implement personalized medicine in the treatment of circulatory shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1726–1734.
    1. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:775–787.
    1. Cooper HA, Panza JA. Cardiogenic shock. Cardiol Clin 2013; 31:567–580. viii.
    1. Reddy K, Sinha P, O’Kane CM, et al. Subphenotypes in critical care: translation into clinical practice. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8:631–643.
    1. Conway SR, Wong HR. Biomarker panels in critical care. Crit Care Clin 2020; 36:89–104.