Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):741-746.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0912.

Positive Predictive Value of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody Testing

Affiliations

Positive Predictive Value of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody Testing

Elia Sechi et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG1-associated disorder (MOGAD) is a distinct central nervous system-demyelinating disease. Positive results on MOG-IgG1 testing by live cell-based assays can confirm a MOGAD diagnosis, but false-positive results may occur.

Objective: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of MOG-IgG1 testing in a tertiary referral center.

Design, setting, and participants: This diagnostic study was conducted over 2 years, from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019. Patients in the Mayo Clinic who were consecutively tested for MOG-IgG1 by live cell-based flow cytometry during their diagnostic workup were included. Patients without research authorization were excluded.

Main outcomes and measures: Medical records of patients who were tested were initially reviewed by 2 investigators blinded to MOG-IgG1 serostatus, and pretest probability was classified as high or low (suggestive of MOGAD or not). Testing of MOG-IgG1 used a live-cell fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assay; an IgG binding index value of 2.5 or more with an end titer of 1:20 or more was considered positive. Cases positive for MOG-IgG1 were independently designated by 2 neurologists as true-positive or false-positive results at last follow-up, based on current international recommendations on diagnosis or identification of alternative diagnoses; consensus was reached for cases in which disagreement existed.

Results: A total of 1617 patients were tested, and 357 were excluded. Among 1260 included patients tested over 2 years, the median (range) age at testing was 46 (0-98) years, and 792 patients were female (62.9%). A total of 92 of 1260 (7.3%) were positive for MOG-IgG1. Twenty-six results (28%) were designated as false positive by the 2 raters, with an overall agreement on 91 of 92 cases (99%) for true and false positivity. Alternative diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (n = 11), infarction (n = 3), B12 deficiency (n = 2), neoplasia (n = 2), genetically confirmed adrenomyeloneuropathy (n = 1), and other conditions (n = 7). The overall PPV (number of true-positive results/total positive results) was 72% (95% CI, 62%-80%) and titer dependent (PPVs: 1:1000, 100%; 1:100, 82%; 1:20-40, 51%). The median titer was higher with true-positive results (1:100 [range, 1:20-1:10000]) than false-positive results (1:40 [range, 1:20-1:100]; P < .001). The PPV was higher for children (94% [95% CI, 72%-99%]) vs adults (67% [95% CI, 56%-77%]) and patients with high pretest probability (85% [95% CI, 76%-92%]) vs low pretest probability (12% [95% CI, 3%-34%]). The specificity of MOG-IgG1 testing was 97.8%.

Conclusions and relevance: This study confirms MOG-IgG1 as a highly specific biomarker for MOGAD, but when using a cutoff of 1:20, it has a low PPV of 72%. Caution is advised in the interpretation of low titers among patients with atypical phenotypes, because ordering MOG-IgG1 in low pretest probability situations will increase the proportion of false-positive results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pittock reports receiving grants, personal fees paid to Mayo Clinic, and nonfinancial support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc and MedImmune Inc/Viela Bio; receiving personal fees from Genentech/Roche, UCB, and Astellas, outside the submitted work; holding patent 8,889,102 (application 12-678350) issued and patent 9,891,219B2 (application 12-573942) issued; and serving as a director of the Neuroimmunology Laboratory at Mayo Clinic. He receives no royalties from the sale of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–IgG1 testing at the Neuroimmunology Laboratory; however, Mayo Clinic Laboratories does receive revenue for conducting such tests. Dr Weinshenker reported personal fees from Alexion and Viela Bio for serving on attack adjudication committees for clinical trials in neuromyelitis optica; consulting fees from Chugai, Genentech, and Mitsubishi Tanabe regarding clinical trials for neuromyelitis optica; and consulting and speaking fees from Roche regarding clinical trials for neuromyelitis optica, outside the submitted work. In addition, Dr Weinshenker has a patent for neuromyelitis optica–IgG for a diagnostic test of neuromyelitis optica and associated conditions with royalties paid from RSR Ltd, Oxford University, Hospices Civil de Lyon, and MVZ Labor PD Dr Volkmann und Kollegen GbR. Dr Tobin has received research funding from Mallinckrodt Inc, the Mayo Clinic Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, and the National Institutes of Health (grant 1R01NS113803-01A1) outside the submitted work. Dr McKeon received research funding from Alexion, Grifols, and MedImmune and has patents pending for the following IgGs as biomarkers of autoimmune neurological disorders: Septin-5, Septin-7, Kelch-like protein 11, GFAP, PDE10A, and MAP1B. Dr McKeon also reported grants from EUROIMMUN and Grifols outside the submitted work. Dr Flanagan reported receiving research support from MedImmune/Viela Bio as a site principal investigator in a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of inebilizumab (a CD19 inhibitor) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, as well as funding from the National Institutes of Health (grant R01NS113828). Dr Mills reported holding patent 10,267,806, with royalties paid, from the Binding Site. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Distribution of Antibody Titers and IgG-Binding Index (IBI) Values Among True-Positive and False-Positive Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG)–IgG1 Cases
A and B, Boxplots showing the distribution of MOG-IgG1 end titers and screening IBI values, respectively, among false-positive and true-positive MOG-IgG1–associated disorder (MOGAD). Titers of 1000 or more and IBI values of 76.4 or more yield 100% specificity and positive predictive values for true MOGAD. C, Boxplot showing the correlation between MOG-IgG1 titer and IBI value (Spearman ρ, 0.86). True-positive and false-positive MOG-IgG1–positive cases in the 3 plots are displayed in gray open circles and orange dots, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Representative Examples of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings in True-Positive vs False-Positive Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG)–IgG1 Cases
True-positive cases (A-D): axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image showing large, multifocal, poorly demarcated lesions on brain MRI in a patient with an acute disseminated encephalomyelitis attack in MOG-IgG1–associated disorder (MOGAD) (A); axial postgadolinium T1-weighted orbit MRI showing longitudinally extensive enhancement of the left optic nerve sheath in a patient with optic neuritis as a manifestation of MOGAD (B); sagittal T2-weighted images showing a longitudinally extensive myelitis lesion along the lower thoracic spinal cord, with predominant involvement of the central gray-matter on axial images in MOGAD (C and D). False-positive cases (E-K): sagittal FLAIR image showing Dawson-finger T2-hyperintense lesions perpendicular to the ventricle, typical of multiple sclerosis (E); axial postgadolinium T1-weighted images showing multiple areas of nodular enhancement in the pons that brainstem biopsy confirmed to be a histiocytic disorder (F); axial T2-weighted image showing a peripheral dorsolateral hyperintense lesion abutting the surface of the spinal cord, in another patient with multiple sclerosis (G); sagittal T2-weighted image showing a faint longitudinally extensive T2-hyperintense lesion accompanied by marked cervical spinal cord swelling with an intralesional cyst (H), also appreciable on axial images (I), which biopsy confirmed to be a glioma; sagittal (J) and axial (K) T2-weighted spinal cord MRI showing normal signal intensity and initial atrophy in a young adult man with X-linked adrenomyeloneuropathy.

References

    1. López-Chiriboga AS, Majed M, Fryer J, et al. . Association of MOG-IgG serostatus with relapse after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and proposed diagnostic criteria for MOG-IgG–associated disorders. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(11):1355-1363. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarius S, Paul F, Aktas O, et al. . MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):134. doi:10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Durozard P, Rico A, Boutiere C, et al. . Comparison of the response to rituximab between myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and aquaporin-4 antibody diseases. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(2):256-266. doi:10.1002/ana.25648 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopez-Chiriboga S, Sechi E, Buciuc M, et al. . Long-term outcomes in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G–associated disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waters PJ, Komorowski L, Woodhall M, et al. . A multicenter comparison of MOG-IgG cell-based assays. Neurology. 2019;92(11):e1250-e1255. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms