Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;156(2):270-275.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13721. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

Levator ani muscle avulsion: Digital palpation versus tomographic ultrasound imaging

Ixora Kamisan Atan  1   2 , Sylvia Lin  3   4 , Hans Peter Dietz  1 , Peter Herbison  5 , Peter Donald Wilson  6 ; ProLong Study Group
Affiliations

Levator ani muscle avulsion: Digital palpation versus tomographic ultrasound imaging

Ixora Kamisan Atan et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of digital palpation of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion compared with translabial tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI).

Methods: A cross-sectional study, incorporating 195 women involved in a longitudinal cohort study. Palpation for levator integrity was performed, followed by a four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. LAM avulsion defects were diagnosed in the presence of puborectalis muscle detachment from its insertion. Post-processing analysis of ultrasound volumes for LAM integrity on TUI was performed blinded against palpation findings. Agreement between methods was assessed using Cohen's κ.

Results: In all, 388 paired assessments of LAM bilaterally, were available. Sixteen (8.2%) unilateral avulsion defects were detected on palpation. Sonographically, 31 (16%) were diagnosed with avulsions: 4.6% bilateral and 11.3% unilateral. An overall agreement of 91% was observed between digital palpation and TUI, yielding a Cohen's κ of 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.48) demonstrating "fair agreement": and implying 25% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 63% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value. Analysis of the first and last 20 palpations showed no change in performance during the 13-day study period.

Conclusion: Assessment of LAM avulsion defects by digital palpation is feasible but may require substantial training. Confirmation by imaging is crucial, especially if the diagnosis of avulsion may influence clinical management.

Keywords: diagnosis levator avulsion; levator avulsion; pelvic floor ultrasound; tomographic ultrasound imaging; translabial ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lien K-C, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):31.
    1. Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:707-712.
    1. Kearney R, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, DeLancey J. Obstetrics factors associated with levator ani injury after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(1):144-149.
    1. Dietz HP, Steensma AB. The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113(2):225-230.
    1. Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(1):13-21.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources