Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 26;14(1):69.
doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01054-w.

Current and future treatment strategies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Affiliations
Review

Current and future treatment strategies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Krish Patel et al. J Hematol Oncol. .

Abstract

Treatment decisions for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are dependent on symptoms and classification into high-, medium-, or low-risk categories. The prognosis for CLL hinges, in part, on the presence or absence of less-favorable genetic aberrations, including del(17p), del(11q), TP53 dysfunction, and IGHV mutations, as these markers are associated with worse treatment response. Promising results from multiple clinical trials show emerging therapies targeting Burton tyrosine kinase, B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta result in better outcomes and prolonged progression-free survival for patients both with and without certain high-risk aberrations. Favorable outcomes using these novel oral targeted therapies, either alone or in combination with other treatments such as anti-CD20 antibodies, has led to their use almost entirely supplanting chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of CLL. In this narrative review, we summarize the current clinical evidence for the use of targeted mono- and combination therapies for CLL, discuss new and next-generation treatment approaches currently in development, and provide insight into areas of unmet need for the treatment of patients with CLL.

Keywords: BTK inhibitors; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Emerging treatment; Treatment strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JMP has consulted for AstraZeneca, Loxo Oncology, BeiGene, and Gilead. KP has consulted for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, BMS, Kite, and TG Therapeutics.

References

    1. Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:946–965. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24826. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson L, Wyld P, Catovsky D. Disease burden of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia within the European Union. Eur J Haematol. 2008;81:253–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01114.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morton LM, Wang SS, Devesa SS, Hartge P, Weisenburger DD, Linet MS. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992–2001. Blood. 2006;107:265–276. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2508. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molica S. Sex differences in incidence and outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006;47:1477–1480. doi: 10.1080/10428190600555819. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevenson FK, Krysov S, Davies AJ, Steele AJ, Packham G. B-cell receptor signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:4313–4320. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-338855. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms