Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 26;63(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00582-2.

Overweight in Swedish show dogs-prevalence and association with performance in competition

Affiliations

Overweight in Swedish show dogs-prevalence and association with performance in competition

Sanna Lindåse et al. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing in companion dogs, but little is known of these conditions in show dogs. This study assessed body condition score (BCS) of show dogs of six selected popular breeds at a major Swedish dog show event and examined the association between BCS and performance in competition.

Results: At one of Sweden's largest dog shows, BCS of 120 dogs of six different breeds was assessed by trained animal healthcare personnel, using a 9-point BCS scale with conditional cut-off for overweight set to BCS ≥ 6. Prevalence of overweight in the cohort was 32% but all overweight dogs except one displayed only slight overweight (BCS 6) and no dog was assessed as obese (BCS 8-9). Prevalence of overweight differed significantly between breeds (P < 0.0001) with Labrador retrievers, Golden retrievers and French bulldogs showing the highest mean BCS (5.6-5.7) and highest prevalence of overweight (50-67%). Lean and overweight dogs received awards and higher show awards (certificates) to the same extent, and no significant association between slight overweight and performance in competition was found.

Conclusions: Prevalence of overweight in Swedish show dogs was relatively high and in the same range as in the Swedish dog population as a whole. Dog owners, breeders and judges should be made aware of canine obesity problems and trained in BCS assessment, to better prevent canine overweight and associated health risks. This is particularly important for retriever and brachycephalic breeds, which showed high prevalence of slight overweight and have breed-specific health problems exacerbated by overweight. Owners and breeders of traditionally sturdy dog breeds should be informed that overweight dogs do not outperform lean dogs in competition.

Keywords: BCS; BCS assessment; Body condition score; Canine; Dog show competition; Obesity; Overweight prevalence; Show dogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplot distribution of body condition score (BCS) within each breed. Dogs were assessed according to the 9-point BCS scale, where dogs with BCS 4–5 were considered lean and dogs with BCS ≥ 6 were considered overweight (total number of dogs n = 120). Values are given as mean (cross), 25% and 75% percentile (box), and min/max (whiskers). Breed shown on x-axis; chihuahua (C), dachshund (D), French bulldog (FB), Golden retriever (GR), Labrador retriever (LR) and whippet (W)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Body condition score (BCS) and performance in competition of each selected breed. Dogs were assessed according to the 9-point BCS scale, where dogs with BCS 4–5 were grouped as lean and dogs with BCS ≥ 6 were grouped as overweight. (af) Bar chart for each breed. Performance in competition (‘award’ versus ‘no award’) did not depend on BCS (‘lean’ versus ‘overweight’) within each breed (Fisher’s exact test, P-values in diagrams)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Body condition score (BCS) and performance in competition of all dogs. Dogs were assessed according to the 9-point BCS scale, where dogs with BCS 4–5 were grouped as lean and dogs with BCS ≥ 6 were grouped as overweight. Performance in higher levels of competition (‘certificate’ versus ‘no certificate’) did not depend on BCS (‘lean’ versus ‘overweight’) for all dogs included (Fisher’s exact test, P-value in diagram)

References

    1. Sandøe P, Palmer C, Corr S, Astrup A, Bjørnvad CR. Canine and feline obesity: a one health perspective. Vet Rec. 2014;175:610–6. doi: 10.1136/vr.g7521. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muñoz-Prieto A, Nielsen LR, Dąbrowski R, Bjørnvad CR, Söder J, Lamy E, et al. European dog owner perceptions of obesity and factors associated with human and canine obesity. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31532-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGreevy P, Thomson P, Pride C, Fawcett A, Grassi T, Jones B. Prevalence of obesity in dogs examined by Australian veterinary practices and the risk factors involved. Vet Rec. 2005;156:695–702. doi: 10.1136/vr.156.22.695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjørnvad CR, Gloor S, Johansen SS, Sandøe P, Lund TB. Neutering increases the risk of obesity in male dogs but not in bitches—a cross-sectional study of dog- and owner-related risk factors for obesity in danish companion dogs. Prev Vet Med. 2019;170:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104730. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Klausner JS. Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. Int J Appl Res Vet M. 2006;4:177.