Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 27;18(1):87.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6.

A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control

Laura Tarzia  1   2 , Kelsey Hegarty  3   4
Affiliations

A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control

Laura Tarzia et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a hidden form of violence against women. It includes behaviours intended to control or dictate a woman's reproductive autonomy, for the purpose of either preventing or promoting pregnancy.

Main text: In this commentary, we argue that there is a lack of conceptual clarity around RCA that is a barrier to developing a robust evidence base. Furthermore, we suggest that there is a poor understanding of the way that RCA intersects with other types of violence (intimate partner violence; sexual violence) and-as a result-inconsistent definition and measurement in research and healthcare practice. To address this, we propose a new way of understanding RCA that centres perpetrator intent and the presence of fear and/or control. Recommendations for future research are also discussed.

Conclusion: We suggest that IPV and SV are the mechanisms through which RCA is perpetrated. In other words, RCA cannot exist without some other form of co-occurring violence in a relationship. This has important implications for research, policy and healthcare practice including for screening and identification of women in reproductive healthcare settings.

Keywords: Family violence; Intimate partner violence; Reproductive autonomy; Reproductive coercion; Sexual violence; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Intersections between RCA, intimate partner violence, family violence and sexual violence [21]
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
How family and intimate partner violence are harnessed to perpetrate RCA
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Miller E, Decker M, McCauley H, Tancredi D, Levenson R, Waldman J, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. TVA. 2018;19(4):371–390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverman J, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women's reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark LE, Allen RH, Goyal V, Raker C, Gottlieb AS. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):42.e1–8. - PubMed
    1. Northridge JL, Silver EJ, Talib HJ, Coupey SM. Reproductive coercion in high school-aged girls: associations with reproductive health risk and intimate partner violence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(6):603–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.06.007. - DOI - PubMed