Ultra-thin DSAEK using an innovative artificial anterior chamber pressuriser: a proof-of-concept study
- PMID: 33907884
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05194-0
Ultra-thin DSAEK using an innovative artificial anterior chamber pressuriser: a proof-of-concept study
Abstract
Purpose: To report the impact of establishing and maintaining a high intracameral pressure (ICP) of 200 mmHg on UT-DSAEK graft preparation using an artificial anterior chamber pressuriser (ACP) control unit (Moria SA, Antony, France).
Method: Retrospective laboratory and clinical study. Four paired donor corneas were mounted on an artificial anterior chamber and subjected to 70 mmHg ("low") and 200 mmHg ("high") ICP using an ACP system. The central corneal thinning rate was measured after 5 min using AS-OCT and the endothelial cell viability was analysed using trypan blue and live/dead staining following 70 mmHg and 200 mmHg ICP. Visual outcomes and complications in a clinical case series of nine patients with bullous keratopathy who underwent UT-DSAEK using 200 mmHg ICP during graft preparation are reported.
Results: Laboratory outcomes showed 2 ± 1% and 2 ± 2% dead cells following 70 mmHg and 200 mmHg ICP respectively. Percentage viability in the 70 mmHg group (52.94 ± 5.88%) was not found to be significantly different (p = 0.7) compared to the 200 mmHg group (59.14 ± 10.43%). The mean corneal thinning rate after applying 200 mmHg ICP was 27 ± 13 μm/min centrally (7.2%/min). In the clinical case series, two cases were combined with cataract surgery. Re-bubbling rate was 11%. At the last follow-up (259 ± 109 days), graft thickness was 83 ± 22 μm centrally, endothelial cell density was 1175 ± 566 cell/mm2 and the BCVA of 0.08 ± 0.12 logMAR was recorded with no episodes of rejection.
Conclusion: ACP control unit for UT-DSAEK graft preparation helps in consistently obtaining UT-DSAEK grafts without compromising endothelial cell viability.
Keywords: Corneal thinning; Endothelial cells; Endothelial keratoplasty; Eye bank; Intracameral pressure; Thickness; Ultrathin DSAEK.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, Shortt AJ (2018) Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD012097 - PubMed
-
- Ruzza A, Parekh M, Salvalaio G et al (2015) (2015) Bubble technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation in an eye bank: air or liquid? Acta Ophthalmol 93:e129-134 - DOI
-
- Busin M, Albé E (2014) Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:312–318 - DOI
-
- Dickman MM, Cheng YY, Berendschot TT, van den Biggelaar FJ, Nuijts RM (2013) Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol 131:737–744. Erratum in: JAMA Ophthalmol 131:1102 - DOI
-
- Gorovoy MS (2006) Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 25:886–889 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
