Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps
- PMID: 33907982
- PMCID: PMC8739406
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps
Abstract
Background: Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm.
Objective: As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff.
Design: We used a semi-structured interview guide to collect qualitative data from Veterans Affairs (VA) facility staff who had experience with test results management and patient safety.
Setting: Twelve VA facilities across the USA.
Participants: Facility staff members (n = 27), including clinicians, lab and imaging professionals, nursing staff, patient safety professionals, and leadership.
Approach: We conducted a content analysis of interview transcripts to identify perceived barriers and high-risk areas for effective test result management, as well as recommendations for improvement.
Results: We identified seven themes to guide further development of interventions to improve test result follow-up. Themes related to trainees, incidental findings, tracking systems for electronic health record notifications, outdated contact information, referrals, backup or covering providers, and responsibility for test results pending at discharge. Participants provided recommendations for improvement within each theme.
Conclusions: Perceived barriers and recommendations for improving test result follow-up often reflected previously known problems and their corresponding solutions, which have not been consistently implemented in practice. Better policy solutions and improvement methods, such as quality improvement collaboratives, may bridge the implementation gaps between knowledge and practice.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
How context affects electronic health record-based test result follow-up: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 11;4(11):e005985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005985. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25387758 Free PMC article.
-
Sustainment stories: a qualitative analysis of barriers to sustainment of the National Rural Transitions of Care Nurse Program.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 28;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07420-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35090448 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-22. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011. PMID: 21486478 Free PMC article.
-
Staff Perspectives on Primary Care Teams as De Facto "Hubs" for Care Coordination in VA: a Qualitative Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):82-89. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04967-y. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31011971 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 22;9(3):e37313. doi: 10.2196/37313. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 36136374 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic and behavioral determinants of non-compliance with physician referrals following community screening for diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia: a mixed-methods study.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47168-8. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37996479 Free PMC article.
-
Association of patient and health care organization factors with incidental nodule guidelines adherence: A multi-system observational study.Lung Cancer. 2024 Apr;190:107526. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107526. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Lung Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38452601 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 18;12(2):153-162. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0113. eCollection 2025 May 1. Diagnosis (Berl). 2024. PMID: 39422050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identifying the mechanisms that contribute to safe and effective electronic test result management systems- a multisite qualitative study.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):89-96. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab235. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34741512 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Poon E, Gandhi T, Sequist T, Murff H, Karson A, Bates D. “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!”: Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(20):2223–8. - PubMed
-
- Schiff GD, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert B, Elstein AS. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Publication Nos. 050021 (1-4); 2005. Diagnosing diagnostic errors: Lessons from a multi-institutional collaborative project; pp. 255–78.
-
- Murphy DR, Laxmisan A, Reis BA, Thomas EJ, Esquivel A, Forjuoh SN, et al. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(1):8–16. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous