Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;26(3):889-899.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system

T J Holleran  1   2 , M A Napolitano  2   3 , A D Sparks  3 , J E Duncan  1 , M Garrett  1 , F J Brody  4   5
Affiliations

Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system

T J Holleran et al. Hernia. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Robotic inguinal hernia repair (RHR) is an evolving technique but is comparatively expensive and has yet to show superior outcomes versus open (OHR) or laparoscopic (LHR) approaches. The utilization and clinical outcomes of RHR have not been reported within the veterans affairs (VA) system. This study analyzes trends in utilization and 30-day post-operative outcomes between OHR, LHR, and RHR in veterans.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients that underwent inguinal herniorrhaphy using the Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable analysis of outcomes was performed adjusting for pre-operative confounding covariates between OHR, LHR, and RHR. Trends in utilization, complication rates, and operative times were also reported.

Results: From 2008-2019, 124,978 cases of inguinal herniorrhaphy were identified: 100,880 (80.7%) OHR, 18,035 (14.4%) LHR, and 6063 (4.9%) RHR. Compared to LHR, RHR was associated with 4.94 times higher odds of complications, 100 min longer mean operative time, and 1.5 days longer median length of stay (LOS). Compared to OHR, RHR was associated with 5.92 times higher odds of complications, 57 min longer mean operative time, and 1.1 days longer median LOS. Utilization of RHR and LHR significantly increased over time. RHR complication rates decreased over time (2008: 20.8% to 2019: 3.2%) along with mean operative times (2008: 4.9 h to 2019: 2.8 h; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: While this study demonstrated inferior outcomes after RHR, the temporal trends are encouraging. This may be due to increased surgeon experience with robotics. Further prospective data will elucidate the role of RHR as this technique increases.

Keywords: Database; Inguinal hernia; Outcomes; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Ruhl CE, Everhart JE (2007) Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol 165(10):1154–1161 - DOI
    1. Berndsen MR, Gudbjartsson T, Berndsen FH (2019) Inguinal hernia—review. Laeknabladid 105(9):385–391. https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2019.09.247 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller HJ (2018) Inguinal hernia: mastering the anatomy. Surg Clin North Am 98(3):607–621 - DOI
    1. Köckerling F, Simons MP (2018) Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visc Med 34(2):145–150. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487278 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Stroupe KT, Manheim LM, Luo P et al (2006) Tension-free repair versus watchful waiting for men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Am Coll Surg 203(4):458–468 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources