SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021
- PMID: 33909349
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29744
SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021
Abstract
The current document commissioned by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society represents a comprehensive update to the 2012 and 2016 consensus documents on patient-centered best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Comprising updates to staffing and credentialing, as well as evidence-based updates to the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural logistics, clinical standards and patient flow, the document also includes an expanded section on CCL governance, administration, and approach to quality metrics. This update also acknowledges the collaboration with various specialties, including discussion of the heart team approach to management, and working with electrophysiology colleagues in particular. It is hoped that this document will be utilized by hospitals, health systems, as well as regulatory bodies involved in assuring and maintaining quality, safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of patient throughput in this high volume area.
Keywords: appropriate use; econonics/cost-effectiveness; electrophysiology; evidence-based medicine; health care outcomes; health care policy.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Szerlip M, Feldman DN, Aronow HD, et al. SCAI publications committee manual of standard operating procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:145-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28754.
-
- Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to revise the 2007 clinical competence statement on cardiac interventional procedures). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(4):357-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.002.
-
- Blankenship JC, Rosenfield K, Jennings HS. Privileging and credentialing for interventional cardiology procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(4):655-663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25793.
-
- Singh M, Holmes DR, Lennon RJ, Rihal CS. Development and validation of risk adjustment models for long-term mortality and myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(5):423-430. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.924308.
-
- Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1923-1932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.005.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous