Sex differences in inflammatory markers in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection: Insights from the MGH COVID-19 patient registry
- PMID: 33909684
- PMCID: PMC8081177
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250774
Sex differences in inflammatory markers in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection: Insights from the MGH COVID-19 patient registry
Abstract
Background: Men are at higher risk for serious complications related to COVID-19 infection than women. More robust immune activation in women has been proposed to contribute to decreased disease severity, although systemic inflammation has been associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19 infection. Whether systemic inflammation contributes to sex differences in COVID-19 infection is not known.
Study design and methods: We examined sex differences in inflammatory markers among 453 men (mean age 61) and 328 women (mean age 62) hospitalized with COVID-19 infection at the Massachusetts General Hospital from March 8 to April 27, 2020. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association of sex with initial and peak inflammatory markers. Exploratory analyses examined the association of sex and inflammatory markers with 28-day clinical outcomes using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Initial and peak CRP were higher in men compared with women after adjustment for baseline differences (initial CRP: ß 0.29, SE 0.07, p = 0.0001; peak CRP: ß 0.31, SE 0.07, p<0.0001) with similar findings for IL-6, PCT, and ferritin (p<0.05 for all). Men had greater than 1.5-greater odds of dying compared with women (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04-2.80, p = 0.03). Sex modified the association of peak CRP with both death and ICU admission, with stronger associations observed in men compared with women (death: OR 9.19, 95% CI 4.29-19.7, p <0.0001 in men vs OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.52-5.18, p = 0.009 in women, Pinteraction = 0.02).
Conclusions: In a sample of 781 men and women hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, men exhibited more robust inflammatory activation as evidenced by higher initial and peak inflammatory markers, as well as worse clinical outcomes. Better understanding of sex differences in immune responses to COVID-19 infection may shed light on the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Lubitz receives sponsored research support from Bristol Myers Squibb / Pfizer, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fitbit, and IBM, and has consulted for Bristol Myers Squibb / Pfizer, Bayer AG, and Blackstone Life Sciences. Dr. Foulkes received sponsored research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Fitbit. Dr. Ho has received research support from Gilead Sciences and Bayer AG, and research supplies from EcoNugenics. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures
References
-
- The COVID-19 Sex-Disaggregated Data Tracker 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 HL139731/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL140224/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K24 AI141036/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- 5T32HL094301-07/NH/NIH HHS/United States
- AHA/American Heart Association-American Stroke Association/United States
- R37 AI058736/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- 1R01 HL139731/NH/NIH HHS/United States
- T32 HL094301/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 GM127862/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- AI058736-16S1/NH/NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AI058736/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- K24 HL153669/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL134893/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
