Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 1;41(2).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/abfc98.

An audit of published South African diagnostic reference level data

Affiliations
Review

An audit of published South African diagnostic reference level data

C J Trauernicht et al. J Radiol Prot. .

Abstract

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are accepted as a dose optimisation tool for patients undergoing x-ray imaging and are required by South African (SA) legislation for 26 fluoroscopically guided procedures (FGPs). The aim of this paper is to collate all published SA data on DRLs in preparation for a project to establish national DRLs. Systematic searches were conducted of various applicable databases. All research that proposed DRLs for any imaging procedure in South Africa was included. Twenty-one works met inclusion criteria, the earliest from 2001. Two-thirds of all work reported on FGPs and five studies documented computed tomography DRLs. Three publications focussed exclusively on paediatric imaging DRLs. No studies on mammography or dental radiography were found. For clinical procedures with more than one proposed DRL, the range of proposed DRL varied by up to a factor of five. The highest proposed DRL is 373.1 Gy cm2for endovascular aneurysm/aortic repair procedures. Data were collected in six public hospitals and two private hospital groups. Thirty-six authors contributed to the manuscripts, but only six studies had an inter-disciplinary authorship. This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive review of SA DRL data and thereby advances international radiation protection initiatives. The data suggests there is room for more interdisciplinary work and that there must be rigorous standardization of reported parameters and data collection. This audit also highlights the need for standardized terminology, particularly for FGPs.

Keywords: DRL; South Africa; diagnostic reference level.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources