Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
- PMID: 33910631
- PMCID: PMC8082773
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01682-w
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol
Abstract
Background: There is growing interest in the use of routine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to influence the care of individual patients with stroke. However, there are significant gaps in our understanding as to how PROMs influence post-stroke patient care and clinical practice. This is due to factors including the number of purported uses for PROMs and that PROMs are complex interventions, which attempt to stimulate varied actions or behaviours. Therefore, the objective of this realist synthesis is to offer theory-based explanations as to how PROMs influence post-stroke clinical practice and patient care.
Methods: This is a protocol for a realist synthesis, which involves three distinct phases: theory building (phase 1), theory testing and refinement (phase 2) and synthesis (phase 3). Phase 1 will develop initial rough programme theories (IRPTs), through literature searches (from January 2000 onwards) of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the grey literature. Only secondary sources will be included that contribute to the development of IRPTs. Only two IRPTs, prioritised by the stakeholder group, will be taken forward to be tested and refined during phase 2. Further novel searches will be employed in phase 2, utilising the same criteria as phase 1; however, phase 2 searches will not utilise grey literature searches, and only primary research studies that contribute to the refinement of programme theories under investigation will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen and select all returned results. The reviewers will code and annotate relevant sources, resulting in 'fragments' to be extracted and graded based on the richness of their contribution to explanation and causal insight. Further, these fragments will be organised into 'Context-Mechanism-Outcome' configurations. Phase 3 of the review will involve the synthesis of context-mechanism-outcome configurations to form middle-range theory-based explanations and developed logic models for stakeholders to understand how PROMs in post-stroke clinical practice and patient care work for whom, how and under what circumstances.
Discussion: The resulting realist synthesis will provide guidance on the implementation of PROMs within routine post-stroke clinical practice and patient care and act as a touchstone for further testing and refinement of PROMs programmes.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020138649 .
Keywords: Feedback; PROM; Patient care; Patient-reported outcome measure; Realist synthesis; Stroke; Systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34108024 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis.Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 12;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0911-6. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30636637 Free PMC article.
-
Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol.Syst Rev. 2021 May 12;10(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01696-4. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33980307 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e48483. doi: 10.2196/48483. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38015606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jan. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jan. PMID: 28121094 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Disparities in Stroke Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Between Healthcare Systems in Brazil.Front Neurol. 2022 May 6;13:857094. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.857094. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35599734 Free PMC article.
-
Maximising the Quality of Stroke Care: Reporting of Data Collection Methods and Resourcing in National Stroke Registries: A Systematic Review.J Med Syst. 2024 Oct 28;48(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2. J Med Syst. 2024. PMID: 39466451
-
Construct validity and responsiveness of clinical upper limb measures and sensor-based arm use within the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 29;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01512-9. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 39881332 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party . National clinical guideline for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical