Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;592(7856):695-703.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process

Affiliations
Review

The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process

Björn Schumacher et al. Nature. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Ageing is a complex, multifaceted process leading to widespread functional decline that affects every organ and tissue, but it remains unknown whether ageing has a unifying causal mechanism or is grounded in multiple sources. Phenotypically, the ageing process is associated with a wide variety of features at the molecular, cellular and physiological level-for example, genomic and epigenomic alterations, loss of proteostasis, declining overall cellular and subcellular function and deregulation of signalling systems. However, the relative importance, mechanistic interrelationships and hierarchical order of these features of ageing have not been clarified. Here we synthesize accumulating evidence that DNA damage affects most, if not all, aspects of the ageing phenotype, making it a potentially unifying cause of ageing. Targeting DNA damage and its mechanistic links with the ageing phenotype will provide a logical rationale for developing unified interventions to counteract age-related dysfunction and disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests:

Jan Vijg is co-founder of SingulOmics Corp., USA

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. DNA damage is the driver of ageing.
The nuclear and mitochondrial genomes are continuously damaged by exogenous agents (UV, X-rays, chemical compounds in food, water, air), endogenous sources such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), aldehydes and advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and spontaneous reactions (hydrolysis). Molecular consequences of time-dependent accumulating DNA damage are: i) genetic aberrations, such as mutations and chromosomal instability, and ii) stalling of RNA and DNA polymerases by DNA lesions, which provokes DNA damage signaling and interferes with primary DNA functioning. Cellular and tissue consequences of DNA damage include cell fate decisions such as cell death and senescence leading to functional loss of cells and organs, cancer, atrophy and inflammation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Molecular, cellular and systemic consequences of DNA damage.
DNA damage and the cellular DNA damage response (DDR) can impinge on molecular processes, alter cell fate and deregulate intercellular communication. DNA damage leads to mutations or chromosomal aberrations thus triggering genome instability. Critically shortened telomeres activate the DDR triggering cellular senescence. DNA repair leads to chromatin-remodeling, while the chromatin structure affects DNA damage susceptibility and repair access. The DDR affects autophagy, the UPRER and leads to a loss of protein complex stoichiometry. Mitochondrial dysfunction is driven by NAD+ deprivation by nuclear DNA repair, DNA damage-induced mitophagy defects, and altered mtDNA polymerase expression that affects mtDNA replication. DNA damage induces dampening of nutrient sensing pathways, which in turn affect DNA damage repair and signaling. Cellular senescence is induced in response to DNA damage. DNA damage causes exhaustion of stem cell pools through DDR-induced apoptosis, senescence, premature differentiation and alterations of the stem cell niche. The DDR impacts intercellular communication through inflammatory cytokines and dampened growth signaling.
Text Box 1 Figure.
Text Box 1 Figure.. Examples of progeroid syndromes caused by DNA repair defects.

References

    1. Schumacher B The Mystery of Human Aging: Surprising Insights from a Science That’s Still Young. (Algora Publishing, 2017).
    1. Charlesworth B Fisher, Medawar, Hamilton and the evolution of aging. Genetics 156, 927–931 (2000). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams GC Pleiotropy, Natural Selection, and the Evolution of Senescence. Evolution (N. Y). 11, 398–411 (1957).
    1. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M & Kroemer G The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindahl T Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362, 709–715 (1993). - PubMed

Publication types