Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 12:11:565755.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.565755. eCollection 2021.

Prognostic Modeling of Patients Undergoing Surgery Alone for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Histopathological and Computed Tomography Based Quantitative Analysis

Affiliations

Prognostic Modeling of Patients Undergoing Surgery Alone for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Histopathological and Computed Tomography Based Quantitative Analysis

Lei-Lei Wu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel computerized quantitative analysis based on histopathological and computed tomography (CT) images for predicting the postoperative prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 153 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy alone and quantitatively analyzed digital histological specimens and diagnostic CT images. We cut pathological images (6000 × 6000) into 50 × 50 patches; each patient had 14,400 patches. Cluster analysis was used to process these patches. We used the pathological clusters to all patches ratio (PCPR) of each case for pathological features and we obtained 20 PCPR quantitative features. Totally, 125 computerized quantitative (20 PCPR and 105 CT) features were extracted. We used a recursive feature elimination approach to select features. A Cox hazard model with L1 penalization was used for prognostic indexing. We compared the following prognostic models: Model A: clinical features; Model B: quantitative CT and clinical features; Model C: quantitative histopathological and clinical features; and Model D: combined information of clinical, CT, and histopathology. Indices of concordance (C-index) and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) were used to assess prognostic model accuracy.

Results: Five PCPR and eight CT features were treated as significant indicators in ESCC prognosis. C-indices adjusted for LOOCV were comparable among four models, 0.596 (Model A) vs. 0.658 (Model B) vs. 0.651 (Model C), and improved to 0.711with Model D combining information of clinical, CT, and histopathology (all p<0.05). Using Model D, we stratified patients into low- and high-risk groups. The 3-year overall survival rates of low- and high-risk patients were 38.0% and 25.0%, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Quantitative prognostic modeling using a combination of clinical data, histopathological, and CT images can stratify ESCC patients with surgery alone into high-risk and low-risk groups.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; medical images; prognosis; quantitative analysis; survival model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The schematic diagram showing the study design; (B) The processing of pathological images.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) The distribution of 20 pathological patches cluster ratio (PPCR) features in alive patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC); (B) The distribution of 20 PPCR features in dead patients with ESCC.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) The ratio of 20 PPCR features to all patches; (B) visualization of image patches influencing outcomes of patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Application of the four different prognostic models to refine the assessment of risk in ESCC. (A–D) Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for a group of patients with ESCC from the whole cohorts and the subgroups predicted to have either a high or a low probability of mortality.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68:394–424 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut (2015) 64:381–7 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edgren G, Adami HO, Weiderpass E, Nyrén O. A global assessment of the oesophageal adenocarcinoma epidemic. Gut (2013) 62:1406–14 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang H, Fan JH, Qiao YL. Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. Cancer Biol Med (2017) 14:33–41 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0093 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Gastroenterology (2018) 154:360–73 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources