Protective effect of calcium silicate toothpaste on enamel erosion and abrasion in vitro
- PMID: 33912715
- PMCID: PMC8066351
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06741
Protective effect of calcium silicate toothpaste on enamel erosion and abrasion in vitro
Abstract
Objectives: To compare in vitro the effect of a toothpaste containing fluoride (F), calcium silicate (CaSi) and sodium phosphate salts to conventional toothpaste (NaF) on human enamel specimens submitted to erosive and abrasive challenges.
Methods: 48 sound and 48 enamel samples pre-treated with 1% citric acid were divided into 4 groups (n = 12): Group 1- Non-fluoride toothpaste; Group 2- NaF toothpaste (1450 ppmF); Group 3- CaSi toothpaste (1450 ppmF; MFP); Group 4- Erosion only. The samples were subjected to pH cycling (3 cycles/day; 90s; 1% citric acid, pH 3.6) and to abrasion for 7 days. After the 1st and the last cycle, they were submitted to abrasion (15s, 1.5N load), using a brushing machine, soft toothbrush and toothpaste slurry (1:3; 15ml/sample) and then immersed in the slurry for 45s. Samples were immersed in artificial saliva between the challenges. Enamel loss was evaluated using profilometry on days 3 and 7. Data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05).
Results: For sound enamel at baseline, mean (±SD) enamel loss (μm) for groups 1-4 on day 3 was 2.15 ± 0.35a, 1.20 ± 0.22b, 0.95 ± 0.19b and 1.98 ± 0.32a; on day 7 was 3.05 ± 0.40a, 2.07 ± 0.32b, 1.36 ± 0.33c and 3.69 ± 0.27d respectively. For acid-softened enamel at baseline, enamel loss on day 3 was 3.16 ± 0.19a, 2.17 ± 0.14b, 1.70 ± 0.11c and 3.04 ± 0.19a; on day 7 was 3.92 ± 0.25a, 3.07 ± 0.13b, 2.09 ± 0.15c and 3.87 ± 0.25a respectively.
Conclusions: Both F toothpastes led to significantly higher enamel protection from short-term erosion and abrasion in comparison to the non-F toothpaste and erosion only. In the longer term, CaSi toothpaste conferred significantly higher protection than NaF toothpaste.
Clinical significance: The results showed that for the longer term the CaSi toothpaste provided significantly higher protection than the NaF toothpaste, which indicates a good potential of the former to help prevent erosive tooth wear.
Keywords: Abrasion; Enamel; Erosion; Toothbrushing; Toothpaste.
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following conflict of interests: Dr Andrew Joiner works at Unilever. Unilever holds a patent on NR5 technology.
Figures
References
-
- Schlueter N., Amaechi B.T., Bartlett D., Buzalaf M.A.R., Carvalho T.S., Ganss C., Hara A.T., Huysmans M., Lussi A., Moazzez R., Vieira A.R., West N.X., Wiegand A., Young A., Lippert F. Terminology of erosive tooth wear: consensus report of a Workshop organized by the ORCA and the cariology research group of the IADR. Caries Res. 2020;54(1):2–6. - PubMed
-
- Shellis R.P., Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr. Oral Sci. 2014;25:32–45. - PubMed
-
- Lussi A., Carvalho T.S. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr. Oral Sci. 2014;25:1–15. - PubMed
-
- Baig M., Cook R., Pratten J., Wood R. The effect of shape and size distribution of abrasive particles on the volume loss of enamel using micro-abrasion. Wear. 2020;448–449:203212.
-
- Forward G.C. Role of toothpastes in the cleaning of teeth. Int. Dent. J. 1991;41(3):164–170. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
