Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22:3:100063.
doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100063. eCollection 2021.

"When it comes to time of removal, nothing is straightforward": A qualitative study of experiences with barriers to removal of long-acting reversible contraception in Western Kenya

Laura E Britton  1 , Caitlin R Williams  2   3 , Dickens Onyango  4   5   6 , Debborah Wambua  7 , Katherine Tumlinson  2
Affiliations

"When it comes to time of removal, nothing is straightforward": A qualitative study of experiences with barriers to removal of long-acting reversible contraception in Western Kenya

Laura E Britton et al. Contracept X. .

Abstract

Objective: Barriers to removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) threaten reproductive self-determination, but their influence on contraceptive behaviors is not well understood. We describe perspectives of women in Western Kenya concerning LARC removal barriers.

Study design: We used a qualitative descriptive approach with conventional content analysis to analyze transcripts for content and themes from eight focus group discussions (n = 55 participants) and one client journey mapping workshop (n = 9 participants) with women ages 18-49 in Western Kenya who were currently using or had formerly used contraceptives.

Findings: Our primary themes concerned women's experience of LARC removal barriers and the impact on their behaviors and attitudes towards contraception. Women described providers being unwilling to remove LARC, regardless of rationale (including expiration, seeking pregnancy, or experiencing intolerable side effects) or demanding unaffordable fees. Women were reluctant to try LARC for fear of having to use the method for its entire lifespan even if they did not like it. Women saw LARC removal barriers as increasing their risk of unintended pregnancy through non-replacement of expired devices and fostering distrust in the health system.

Conclusion: Barriers to LARC removal may discourage utilization of LARC and contraceptive services generally, which can undermine women's efforts to achieve reproductive self-determination.

Implications: Our findings affirm the importance of timely LARC removal to ensure that family planning programs uphold women's reproductive autonomy.

Keywords: Implant; Intrauterine device; Kenya; Long-acting reversible contraception; Removal; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jacobstein R. Liftoff: the blossoming of contraceptive implant use in Africa. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2018;6:17–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Centre for Reproductive Health - Mombasa, Ministry of Health, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, PMA2020, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health. PMA2020. PMA2015/Kenya: implant use and removal in Kenya, https://www.pma2020.org/reports/pma2015kenya-implants-use-and-removal-kenya; 2016 [Accessed 31 March 2021].
    1. PMA2020. PMA2017/Kenya: implant use and removal in Kenya, https://www.pmadata.org/media/83/download; 2017 [Accessed 31 March 2021].
    1. World Health Organization. Ensuring human rights within contraceptive service delivery: implementation guide, https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/hr_c...; 2015 [Accessed 31 March 2021].
    1. Christofield M., Lacoste M. Accessible contraceptive implant removal services: an essential element of quality service delivery and scale-up. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2016;4:366–372. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources