Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;51(2):135-143.
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2005100255.

Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors

Affiliations

Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors

Su Yeon Park et al. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate factors affecting the antagonistic and adjacent teeth in patients after implant restoration and prosthetic rehabilitation.

Methods: In total, 160 patients who visited Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital for implant surgery, prosthesis placement, and supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 88.06 months, and the maximum was 175 months. Patients' history of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and osteoporosis was investigated, and panoramic radiographs were taken after surgery and prosthetic treatment. During the follow-up period, extraction and prosthetic/endodontic treatments of the antagonistic and adjacent teeth were analyzed. The statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results: Treatment was performed on 29.4% of the studied antagonistic teeth with extraction performed in 20.0% and prosthetic treatment in 10.0%. Furthermore, 19.4% of the studied adjacent teeth underwent treatment, of which extraction was performed in 12.5% and prosthetic treatment in 7.5%. The treatment rate for adjacent teeth was 25.3% in smokers, which was higher than that of non-smokers (12.3%) (P=0.039). Patients who were non-adherent to SPT showed a significantly higher rate (19.6%) of antagonistic prosthetic treatment than did those who were adherent (5.5%) (P=0.006).

Conclusions: Implant restoration can affect the adjacent and antagonistic teeth. Smoking, osteoporosis history, and absence of SPT may be risk factors for the treatment of the adjacent and antagonistic teeth.

Keywords: Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Follow-up studies; Patient compliance; Survival; Treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The proportions of extraction, prosthesis placement, and treatment of antagonistic and adjacent teeth.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yamaga T, Ogawa H, Miyazaki H. Influence of occlusal deterioration considering prosthetics on subsequent all-cause mortality in a Japanese elderly independent population. Gerodontology. 2019;36:163–170. - PubMed
    1. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, Zion GR. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988–1991. J Dent Res. 1996;75(2_suppl):684–695. - PubMed
    1. Millennium Research Group. U.S. markets for dental implants 2001: executive summary. Implant Dent. 2001;10:234–237. - PubMed
    1. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brägger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:185–193. - PubMed
    1. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:26–35. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources