Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 1;10(4):750.
doi: 10.3390/foods10040750.

Diversifying the Utilization of Maize at Household Level in Zambia: Quality and Consumer Preferences of Maize-Based Snacks

Affiliations

Diversifying the Utilization of Maize at Household Level in Zambia: Quality and Consumer Preferences of Maize-Based Snacks

Emmanuel Oladeji Alamu et al. Foods. .

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritional, antinutritional properties, and consumer preferences of five maize-based snacks at the household level. The physical, nutritional, and antinutritional properties were analyzed with standard laboratory methods, while a structured questionnaire was used for the data collection on consumer preferences of the maize products. There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in the proximate parameters of the maize snack samples. Antinutritional properties among maize snacks all fell within the permissible range. Respondents from all districts showed no significant (p > 0.05) differences in maize chin-chin variants' and maize finger variants' except for Serenje and Mkushi districts where maize chin-chin and maize finger showed significant (p < 0.05) differences in their sensory ratings. However, across districts, the most rated maize finger variant was the spiced 100% maize finger. In conclusion, maize-based snacks enriched with soybean flour have proven nutritious with a reasonable acceptability level.

Keywords: consumer preferences; maize snacks; nutritional characterization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Manda J., Gardebroek C., Kuntashula E., Alene A.D. Impact of improved maize varieties on food security in Eastern Zambia: A doubly robust analysis. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2018;22:1709–1728. doi: 10.1111/rode.12516. - DOI
    1. Melkani A., Mason N.M., Mather D.L., Chisanga B. Smallholder Maize Market Participation and Choice of Marketing Channel in the Presence of Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from Zambia (No. 1879-2020-467); Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP) [(accessed on 10 September 2020)];2019 Available online: http://foodsecuritypolicy.msu.edu/
    1. Timler C., Michalscheck M., Alvarez S., Descheemaeker K., Groot J.C. Sustainable Intensification in Smallholder Agriculture: An Integrated Systems Research Approach. Earthscan; London, UK: 2017. Exploring options for sustainable intensification through legume integration in different farm types in Eastern Zambia; pp. 196–209.
    1. Amondo E., Simtowe F., Erenstein O. Productivity and production risk effects of adopting drought-tolerant maize varieties in Zambia. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strat. Manag. 2019;11:570–591. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2018-0024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duncan E.G., O’Sullivan C.A., Roper M.M., Biggs J.S., Peoples M.B. Influence of co-application of Nitrogen with phosphorus, potassium, and Sulphur on the apparent efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer use, grain yield and protein content of wheat. Field Crop. Res. 2018;226:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.010. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources