Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 1;26(7):2004.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26072004.

Simple and Equipment-Free Paper-Based Device for Determination of Mercury in Contaminated Soil

Affiliations

Simple and Equipment-Free Paper-Based Device for Determination of Mercury in Contaminated Soil

Hikmanita Lisan Nashukha et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

This work presents a simple and innovative protocol employing a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (µPAD) for equipment-free determination of mercury. In this method, mercury (II) forms an ionic-association complex of tetraiodomercurate (II) ion (HgI42-(aq)) using a known excess amount of iodide. The residual iodide flows by capillary action into a second region of the paper where it is converted to iodine by pre-deposited iodate to liberate I2(g) under acidic condition. Iodine vapor diffuses across the spacer region of the µPAD to form a purple colored of tri-iodide starch complex in a detection zone located in a separate layer of the µPAD. The digital image of the complex is analyzed using ImageJ software. The method has a linear calibration range of 50-350 mg L-1 Hg with the detection limit of 20 mg L-1. The method was successfully applied to the determination of mercury in contaminated soil and water samples which the results agreed well with the ICP-MS method. Three soil samples were highly contaminated with mercury above the acceptable WHO limits (0.05 mg kg-1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first colorimetric µPAD method that is applicable for soil samples including mercury contaminated soils from gold mining areas.

Keywords: iodometry; mercury; paper-based; soil; tetraiodomercurate; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) The µPAD pattern: (i) acceptor layer A with circular-shaped barrier and (ii) donor layer D with dumbbell-shaped barrier. (b) The three layers of the membraneless gas-separation µPAD, showing alignment of the donor layer, the spacer layer with circular hole and the acceptor layer. (c) 3D-view of assembled device from both the acceptor and donor sides, with position of the transparent tapes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the operating steps for the determination of mercury using the membraneless gas-separation µPAD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of physical parameters on analysis of Hg(II): (a) reaction time and (b) spacer thickness. Experimental conditions: 0.2 mol L−1 KIO3 in 0.2 mol L−1 H2SO4, 10 mmol L−1 KI and 1% (w/v) of starch in 0.1 mmol L−1 KI. For the spacer thickness study, the reaction time is 4 min.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of iodide concentration on analysis of Hg(II): (a) images of purple iodine-starch complex for various concentrations of iodide analysis using a standard solution of 150 mg L−1 Hg and (b) plots of effect of iodide concentrations on the green intensity values (left ordinate) using a standard solution of 150 mg L−1 Hg and sensitivity of Hg(II) analysis (right ordinate). Experimental conditions: 0.2 mol L−1 KIO3 in 0.2 mol L−1 H2SO4, 10 mmol L−1 KI, 1% (w/v) of starch in 0.1 mmol L−1 KI and reaction time of 4 min.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration line using the membraneless gas-separation µPAD for the determination of mercury and the corresponding image of the purple iodine-starch complex.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bar plots of the concentrations of mercury in digested soil and water samples as determined using the membraneless gas-separation µPAD and the reference ICP-MS method. The digested soil samples, S1–S3, were analyzed directly using ICP-MS with appropriate dilution. The other digested soil samples, S4–S10, were spiked at 2500 mg kg−1 Hg. The water samples, W1–W4, were spiked at 100 mg L−1 Hg.

References

    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency . EPA-452/R-97-004, Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume II: An Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 1997.
    1. United Nations Environment Programme . A Practical Guide: Reducing Mercury Use in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. UNEP; Geneva, Switzerland: 2013.
    1. Esdaile L.J., Chalker J.M. The mercury problem in artisanal and small-scale gold mining. Chem. Eur. J. 2018;24:6905–6916. doi: 10.1002/chem.201704840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park J.D., Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J. Prev. Med. Public Health. 2012;45:344–352. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency . Method 245.1, Revision 3.0: Determination of Mercury in Water by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 1994.

LinkOut - more resources