Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 8;11(4):471.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040471.

Emotional Reasoning and Psychopathology

Affiliations
Review

Emotional Reasoning and Psychopathology

Amelia Gangemi et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

One of the several ways in which affect may influence cognition is when people use affect as a source of information about external events. Emotional reasoning, ex-consequentia reasoning, and affect-as-information are terms referring to the mechanism that can lead people to take their emotions as information about the external world, even when the emotion is not generated by the situation to be evaluated. Pre-existing emotions may thus bias evaluative judgments of unrelated events or topics. From this perspective, the more people experience a particular kind of affect, the more they may rely on it as a source of valid information. Indeed, in several studies, it was found that adult patients suffering from psychological disorders tend to use negative affect to estimate the negative event as more severe and more likely and to negatively evaluate preventive performance. The findings on this topic have contributed to the debate that theorizes the use of emotional reasoning as responsible for the maintenance of dysfunctional beliefs and the pathological disorders based on these beliefs. The purpose of this paper is to explore this topic by reviewing and discussing the main studies in this area, leading to a deeper understanding of this phenomenon.

Keywords: affect-as-information; anxiety; anxiety disorders; beliefs; depression; emotion; emotional reasoning; guilt; obsessive-compulsive disorder; personality disorders; psychopathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Scherer K.R. Appraisal theory. In: Dalgleish T., Power M.J., editors. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 1999. pp. 637–663. - DOI
    1. Caprara G.V., Cervone D. Personality: Determinants, Dynamics, and Potentials. Cambridge University Press; Boston, MA, USA: 2000.
    1. Arntz A., Rauner M., van den Hout M. “If I feel anxious, there must be danger”: Ex-consequentia reasoning in inferring danger in anxiety disorder. Behav. Res. Ther. 1995;33:917–925. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00032-S. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1983;45:513–523. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513. - DOI
    1. Clore G.L. Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In: Martin L.L., Tesser A., editors. The Construction of Social Judgments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1992.

LinkOut - more resources