Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4395.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094395.

The Evolution of Gambling-Related Harm Measurement: Lessons from the Last Decade

Matthew Browne  1 , Vijay Rawat  1 , Catherine Tulloch  1 , Cailem Murray-Boyle  1 , Matthew Rockloff  1
Affiliations
Review

The Evolution of Gambling-Related Harm Measurement: Lessons from the Last Decade

Matthew Browne et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Jurisdictions around the world have a self-declared mandate to reduce gambling-related harm. However, historically, this concept has suffered from poor conceptualisation and operationalisation. However, recent years have seen swift advances in measuring gambling harm, based on the principle of it being a quantifiable decrement to the health and wellbeing of the gambler and those connected to them. This review takes stock of the background and recent developments in harm assessment and summarises recent research that has validated and applied the Short Gambling Harms Screen and related instruments. We recommend that future work builds upon the considerable psychometric evidence accumulated for the feasibility of direct elicitation of harmful consequences. We also advocate for grounding harms measures with respect to scalar changes to public health utility metrics. Such an approach will avoid misleading pseudo-clinical categorisations, provide accurate population-level summaries of where the burden of harm is carried, and serve to integrate gambling research with the broader field of public health.

Keywords: gambling; gambling harm; measurement; problem gambling; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Browne M., Rawat V., Newall P., Begg S., Rockloff M., Hing N. A framework for indirect elicitation of the public health impact of gambling problems. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09813-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brazier J., Roberts J., Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J. Health Econ. 2002;21:271–292. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Browne M. Measuring harm from gambling and estimating its distribution in the population. In: Bowden-Jones H., Dickson C., Dunand C., Simon O., editors. Harm Reduction for Gambling: A Public Health Approach. Routledge; London, UK: 2019.
    1. Raybould J.N., Larkin M., Tunney R.J. Is there a health inequality in gambling related harms? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10337-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baxter D.G., Hilbrecht M., Wheaton C.T.J. A mapping review of research on gambling harm in three regulatory environments. Harm Reduct. J. 2019;16:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0265-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources