Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 14;13(4):1284.
doi: 10.3390/nu13041284.

How Do Consumers Perceive Cultured Meat in Croatia, Greece, and Spain?

Paula Franceković  1 , Lucía García-Torralba  1 , Eleni Sakoulogeorga  1 , Tea Vučković  1 , Federico J A Perez-Cueto  1
Affiliations

How Do Consumers Perceive Cultured Meat in Croatia, Greece, and Spain?

Paula Franceković et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The meat production industry is one of the leading contributors of greenhouse gas emissions. Cultured meat presents itself as a potential eco- and animal-friendly meat substitute which has the potential to eradicate animal cruelty and reduce both the environmental footprint and the risk of zoonotic illnesses, while delivering a nutrient-dense product. The purpose of this study was to investigate how consumers perceive cultured meat and if the frequency of meat consumption is related to their intention of trying or purchasing cultured meat. Data were collected online in 2020 from Croatia, Greece, and Spain. Among the 2007 respondents, three segments were identified according to meat consumption and variety, plus an a priori identified group of "non-meat eaters". Sixty percent perceived cultured meat as kind to animals, 57% as unnatural, 45% as healthy and environmentally-friendly, 21% as disgusting, and only 16% as tasty. Although 47% of the respondents had not heard of cultured meat before, 47% would taste it and 41% would purchase it for the same price as conventional meat. This indicates that consumers from Croatia, Greece and Spain might be likely to purchase cultured meat if sold at an affordable price.

Keywords: European consumers; consumer perception; cultured meat; meat consumption; meat substitutes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Chriki S., Hocquette J.F. The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2020;7:7. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., de Haan C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. FAO; Roma, Italy: 2006. [(accessed on 7 April 2021)]. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e00.htm.
    1. Hoekstra A.Y. The water footprint of animal products. The meat crisis—Developing more sustainable production and consumption. In: Webster J., D’Silva J., editors. The Meat Crisis: Developing More Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2nd ed. Routledge; London, UK: 2017.
    1. Bacon L., Wise J., Attwood S., Vennard D. [(accessed on 7 April 2021)];The Language of Sustainable Diets: A Field Study Exploring the Impact of Renaming Vegetarian Dishes on UK. Café Menus. 2018 Technical Note. Available online: https://www.wri.org/publication/language-sustainable-diets.
    1. Garnett T. Livestock and climate change. In: Webster J., D’Silva J., editors. The Meat Crisis: Developing More Sustainable Production and Consumption. 1st ed. Routledge; London, UK: 2010.

LinkOut - more resources