Comparative Yield of Tuberculosis during Active Case Finding Using GeneXpert or Smear Microscopy for Diagnostic Testing in Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 33919938
- PMCID: PMC8167510
- DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed6020050
Comparative Yield of Tuberculosis during Active Case Finding Using GeneXpert or Smear Microscopy for Diagnostic Testing in Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
This study compared the yield of tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) interventions applied under TB REACH funding. Between June 2017 to November 2018, Birat Nepal Medical Trust identified presumptive cases using simple verbal screening from three interventions: door-to-door screening of social contacts of known index cases, TB camps in remote areas, and screening for hospital out-patient department (OPD) attendees. Symptomatic individuals were then tested using smear microscopy or GeneXpert MTB/RIF as first diagnostic test. Yield rates were compared for each intervention and diagnostic method. We evaluated additional cases notified from ACF interventions by comparing case notifications of the intervention and control districts using standard TB REACH methodology. The project identified 1092 TB cases. The highest yield was obtained from OPD screening at hospitals (n = 566/1092; 52%). The proportion of positive tests using GeneXpert (5.5%, n = 859/15,637) was significantly higher than from microscopy testing 2% (n = 120/6309). (OR = 1.4; 95%CI = 1.12-1.72; p = 0.0026). The project achieved 29% additionality in case notifications in the intervention districts demonstrating that GeneXpert achieved substantially higher case-finding yields. Therefore, to increase national case notification for TB, Nepal should integrate OPD screening using GeneXpert testing in every district hospital and scale up of community-based ACF of TB patient contacts nationally.
Keywords: ACF interventions; ACF strategies; GeneXpert; Nepal; TB yield rate; active case finding.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) Global Tuberculosis Report [Internet]. Geneva. [(accessed on 20 October 2020)];2020 Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336069/9789240013131-en....
-
- Stop TB Partnership The Global Plan to End TB 2016–2020: The Paradigm Shift [Internet] [(accessed on 28 January 2020)];2015 Available online: http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/global/plan/GlobalPlanToEndTB_The....
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) Systematic Screening for Active Tuberculosis: An Operational Guide [Internet] [(accessed on 6 August 2020)];2015 Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/181164/9789241549172_en....
-
- Yuen C.M., Amanullah F., Dharmadhikari A., Nardell E.A., Seddon J.A., Vasilyeva I., Zhao Y., Keshavjee S., Becerra M.C. Turning off the tap: Stopping tuberculosis transmission through active case-finding and prompt effective treatment. Lancet. 2015;386:2334–2343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00322-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization Report of the 16th Meeting of the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Tuberculosis [Internet]. Geneva. [(accessed on 24 September 2020)];2016 Available online: https://www.challengetb.org/reportfiles/stag_tb_report_2016.pdf.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
