Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 10;22(8):3926.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22083926.

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides against Multidrug-Resistant Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli

Affiliations

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides against Multidrug-Resistant Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli

Kang-Chi Wu et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Post-weaning diarrhea due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a common disease of piglets and causes great economic loss for the swine industry. Over the past few decades, decreasing effectiveness of conventional antibiotics has caused serious problems because of the growing emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Various studies have indicated that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have potential to serve as an alternative to antibiotics owing to rapid killing action and highly selective toxicity. Our previous studies have shown that AMP GW-Q4 and its derivatives possess effective antibacterial activities against the Gram-negative bacteria. Hence, in the current study, we evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of GW-Q4 and its derivatives against MDR ETEC and their minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) values were determined to be around 2~32 μg/mL. Among them, AMP Q4-15a-1 with the second lowest MIC (4 μg/mL) and the highest minimal hemolysis concentration (MHC, 256 μg/mL), thus showing the greatest selectivity (MHC/MIC = 64) was selected for further investigations. Moreover, Q4-15a-1 showed dose-dependent bactericidal activity against MDR ETEC in time-kill curve assays. According to the cellular localization and membrane integrity analyses using confocal microscopy, Q4-15a-1 can rapidly interact with the bacterial surface, disrupt the membrane and enter cytosol in less than 30 min. Minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of Q4-15a-1 is 4× MIC (16 μg/mL), indicating that Q4-15a-1 is effective against MDR ETEC biofilm. Besides, we established an MDR ETEC infection model with intestinal porcine epithelial cell-1 (IPEC-1). In this infection model, 32 μg/mL Q4-15a-1 can completely inhibit ETEC adhesion onto IPEC-1. Overall, these results suggested that Q4-15a-1 may be a promising antibacterial candidate for treatment of weaned piglets infected by MDR ETEC.

Keywords: antibiofilm; antimicrobial peptides (AMPs); enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC); intestinal porcine epithelial cell-1 (IPEC-1); multidrug resistance (MDR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Helical-wheel diagrams of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) using HeliQuest (http://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr/ accessed on 1 March 2021). Positively charged residues (Lys) are shown in blue, Asn in pink, and Thr in magenta. Hydrophobic residues (Trp, Tyr, Phe, Leu, Ile) are shown in yellow, Gly and Ala are shown in gray. The arrows indicated the orientation of hydrophobic moment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time–kill curves of multidrug-resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (MDR ETEC) strain treated with different concentration of Q4-15a-1. (1× MIC = 4 μg/mL) formula image Untreated; formula image 0.5× MIC; formula image 1× MIC; formula image 2× MIC; formula image 4× MIC.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Localization of FITC-Q4-15a-1 in multidrug-resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (MDR ETEC) at different time intervals monitored by confocal microscopy. Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell membrane integrity of MDR ETEC treated with Q4-15a-1 of 4× MIC (16 μg/mL) for 10, 20, 30, or 60 min monitored by confocal microscopy. Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Transmission electron microscopy images of 2 × 109 CFU/mL of MDR ETEC left untreated (control) or treated with Q4-15a-1 of 4× or 8× MIC (16 or 32 μg/mL) for 10, 30, or 60 min. Scale bars, 0.2 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cell viability of (A) intestinal porcine epithelial cell line-1 (IPEC-1) and (B) intestinal porcine epithelial cell line-J2 (IPEC-J2) upon exposure to different concentrations of AMP Q4-15a-1.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Inhibitory effect of Q4-15a-1 against the adherence of MDR ETEC to IPEC-1 cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailey M. The mucosal immune system: Recent developments and future directions in the pig. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2009;33:375–383. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fairbrother J.M., Nadeau E., Gyles C.L. Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: An update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005;6:17–39. doi: 10.1079/AHR2005105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gyles C.L. Escherichia coli cytotoxins and enterotoxins. Can. J. Microbiol. 1992;38:734–746. doi: 10.1139/m92-120. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hariharan H., Coles M., Poole D., Page R. Antibiotic resistance among enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli from piglets and calves with diarrhea. Can. Vet. J. 2004;45:605–606. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright G.D. The antibiotic resistome. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2010;5:779–788. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2010.497535. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances