Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 11;11(4):1090.
doi: 10.3390/ani11041090.

Performance Evaluation of Two Slow-Medium Growing Chicken Strains Maintained under Organic Production System during Different Seasons

Affiliations

Performance Evaluation of Two Slow-Medium Growing Chicken Strains Maintained under Organic Production System during Different Seasons

Ainhoa Sarmiento-García et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

A total of 160 1-day-old medium-growing male chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) were raised for 120 days in a certified organic farming system. A total of two strains were studied (Coloryield, CY; RedBro, RB). Overall, two weather periods were considered based on the outdoor temperature, being S1 colder than S2. In total, 40 chicks per strain were assigned to each period (n = 80). Chickens were fed ad libitum with the same organic feeds. In the first month, chickens were kept indoors and, from day 30, they had access to the pasture. Slaughter live weight (LW), average daily gains, (ADG), the feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality rates did not differ between the two strains. LW was (p < 0.05) higher in the S1 and a trend (p = 0.084) was observed for ADG, which was higher in S1. No differences were found for feed intake, FCR, and mortality rates between weather periods. There were no differences for coefficient of variation (CV) between the strains studied, nevertheless, CV for LW in S2 was increased. Differences in the productive performance between these strains raised in organic production systems were slight. However, chickens raised in S1 had a better performance. It would be preferable to raise chickens in these weather conditions whenever possible.

Keywords: climate; environment; growth; organic chicken; slow-medium line; weather period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monthly mortality rates (%M) of the RedBro strain during the two weather periods under study. %M30: Percentage of chickens died in the first month; %M60: Percentage of chickens died in the second month; %M90: Percentage of chickens died in the third month; %M90: Percentage of chickens died in the fourth month; %M120: Percentage of chickens died in the fifth month, %M0–120: Percentage of chickens died in total study period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Monthly mortality rates (%M) of the Coloryield strain during the two weather periods under study. %M30: Percentage of chickens died in the first month; %M60: Percentage of chickens died in the second month; %M90: Percentage of chickens died in the third month; %M90: Percentage of chickens died in the fourth month; %M120: Percentage of chickens died in the fifth month, %M0–120: Percentage of chickens died in total study period.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fanatico A.C., Pillai P.B., Cavitt L.C., Owens C.M., Emmert J.L. Evaluation of Slower-Growing Broiler Genotypes Grown with and without Outdoor Access: Growth Performance and Carcass Yield. Poult. Sci. 2005;84:1321–1327. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.8.1321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fanatico A.C., Pillai P.B., Emmert J.L., Owens C.M. Meat Quality of Slow- and Fast-Growing Chicken Genotypes Fed Low-Nutrient or Standard Diets and Raised Indoors or with Outdoor Access. Poult. Sci. 2007;86:2245–2255. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.10.2245. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sundrum A., Padel S., Arsenos G., Kuzniar A., Henriksen B.I.F., Walkenhorst M., Vaarst M. Current and Proposed EU Legislation on Organic Livestock Production, with a Focus on Animal Health, Welfare and Food Safety: A Review; Proceedings of the 5th SAFO Workshop; Odense, Denmark. 1 June 2006.
    1. Fanatico A.C., Pillai P.B., Hester P.Y., Falcone C., Mench J.A., Owens C.M., Emmert J.L. Performance, Livability, and Carcass Yield of Slow- and Fast-Growing Chicken Genotypes Fed Low-Nutrient or Standard Diets and Raised Indoors or with Outdoor Access. Poult. Sci. 2008;87:1012–1021. doi: 10.3382/ps.2006-00424. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosco A.D., Mugnai C., Amato M.G., Piottoli L., Cartoni A., Castellini C. Effect of Slaughtering Age in Different Commercial Chicken Genotypes Reared According to the Organic System: 1. Welfare, Carcass and Meat Traits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;13:3308. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3308. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources