Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 12;10(8):1641.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10081641.

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

Stefanie Kligman et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Implant surface design has evolved to meet oral rehabilitation challenges in both healthy and compromised bone. For example, to conquer the most common dental implant-related complications, peri-implantitis, and subsequent implant loss, implant surfaces have been modified to introduce desired properties to a dental implant and thus increase the implant success rate and expand their indications. Until now, a diversity of implant surface modifications, including different physical, chemical, and biological techniques, have been applied to a broad range of materials, such as titanium, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone, to achieve these goals. Ideal modifications enhance the interaction between the implant's surface and its surrounding bone which will facilitate osseointegration while minimizing the bacterial colonization to reduce the risk of biofilm formation. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss currently available implant surface modifications commonly used in implantology in terms of their impact on osseointegration and biofilm formation, which is critical for clinicians to choose the most suitable materials to improve the success and survival of implantation.

Keywords: biofilm; bone and soft tissue integration; dental implant; osseointegration; surface modification; titanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bobbio A. The first endosseous alloplastic implant in the history of man. Bull. Hist. Dent. 1972;20:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Linkow L.I., Dorfman J.D. Implantology in dentistry. A brief historical perspective. N. Y. State Dent. J. 1991;57:31–35. - PubMed
    1. Adell R. Tissue integrated prostheses in clinical dentistry. Int. Dent. J. 1985;35:259–265. - PubMed
    1. Smith D.E., Zarb G.A. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989;62:567–572. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90081-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Termeie D.A. Periodontal Review Q&A. 2nd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co.; Batavia, IL, USA: 2020.

LinkOut - more resources