Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 22;4(2):26.
doi: 10.3390/mps4020026.

Toxin Removal and Inflammatory State Modulation during Online Hemodiafiltration Using Two Different Dialyzers (TRIAD2 Study)

Affiliations

Toxin Removal and Inflammatory State Modulation during Online Hemodiafiltration Using Two Different Dialyzers (TRIAD2 Study)

Gabriele Donati et al. Methods Protoc. .

Abstract

Uremic toxins play a pathological role in atherosclerosis and represent an important risk factor in dialysis patients. Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been introduced to improve the clearance of middle- and large-molecular-weight solutes (>500 Da) and has been associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality compared to standard hemodialysis. This non-randomized, open-label observational study will explore the efficacy of two dialyzers currently used for online HDF, a polysulfone-based high-flux membrane, and a cellulose triacetate membrane, in hemodialysis patients with signs of middle-molecule intoxication or intradialytic hypotension. In particular, the two filters will be evaluated for their ability in uremic toxin removal and modulation of inflammatory status. Sixteen subjects in standard chronic bicarbonate hemodialysis requiring a switch to online HDF in view of their clinical status will be enrolled and divided into two treatment arms, according to the previous history of hypersensitivity to polysulfone/polyethersulfone dialysis filters and hypersensitivity to drugs or other allergens. Group A will consist of 16 patients without a previous history of hypersensitivity and will be treated with a polysulfone filter (Helixone FX100), and group B, also consisting of 16 patients, with a previous history of hypersensitivity and will be treated with asymmetric triacetate (ATA; SOLACEA 21-H) dialyzer. Each patient will be followed for a period of 24 months, with monthly assessments of circulating middle-weight toxins and protein-bound toxins, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, lymphocyte subsets, activated lymphocytes, and monocytes, cell apoptosis, the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), variations in arterial stiffens measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and mortality rate. The in vitro effect on endothelial cells of uremic serum collected from patients treated with the two different dialyzers will also be investigated to examine the changes in angiogenesis, cell migration, differentiation, apoptosis and proliferative potential, and gene and protein expression profile. The expected results will be a better awareness of the different effects of polysulfone gold-standard membrane for online HDF and the new ATA membrane on the removal of uremic toxins removal and inflammation due to blood-membrane interaction.

Keywords: advanced glycation end-products; cardiovascular mortality; dialysis membranes; end-stage renal disease; inflammation; online hemodiafiltration; toxins removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the asymmetric triacetate (ATA) and cellulose triacetate (CTA) membrane. Adapted with permission from Ref. [23]. Copyright 2020 S. Karger AG.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timetable of specimen collection.

References

    1. O’Lone E., Viecelli A.K., Craig J.C., Tong A., Sautenet B., Roy D., Herrington W.G., Herzog C.A., Jafar T., Jardine M., et al. Cardiovascular outcomes reported in hemodialysis trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;71:2802–2810. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Longenecker J.C., Coresh J., Powe N.R., Levey A.S., Fink N.E., Martin A., Klag M.J. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in dialysis patients compared with the general population: The choice study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:1918–1927. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000019641.41496.1E. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With CKD. [(accessed on 8 December 2020)]; Available online: https://adr.usrds.org/2020/chronic-kidney-disease/4-cardiovascular-disea....
    1. Kendrick J., Chonchol M.B. Nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nat. Clin. Pr. Nephrol. 2008;4:672–681. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0954. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zoccali C. Cardiovascular risk in uraemic patients—Is it fully explained by classical risk factors? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000;15:454–457. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.454. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources