Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 25;11(5):1235.
doi: 10.3390/ani11051235.

Methods for Pain Assessment in Calves and Their Use for the Evaluation of Pain during Different Procedures-A Review

Affiliations
Review

Methods for Pain Assessment in Calves and Their Use for the Evaluation of Pain during Different Procedures-A Review

Theresa Tschoner. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The evaluation and assessment of the level of pain calves are experiencing is important, as the experience of pain (e.g., due to routine husbandry procedures) severely affects the welfare of calves. Studies about the recognition of pain in calves, and especially pain management during and after common procedures, such as castration, dehorning, and disbudding, have been published. This narrative review discusses and summarizes the existing literature about methods for pain assessment in calves. First, it deals with the definition of pain and the challenges associated with the recognition of pain in calves. Then it proceeds to outline the different options and methods for subjective and objective pain assessment in calves, as described in the literature. Research data show that there are several tools suitable for the assessment of pain in calves, at least for research purposes. Finally, it concludes that for research purposes, various variables for the assessment of pain in calves are used in combination. However, there is no variable which can be used solely for the exclusive assessment of pain in calves. Also, further research is needed to describe biomarkers or variables which are easily accessible in the field practice.

Keywords: calves; cortisol; ethogram; pain management; substance P; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image of the “bovine pain face” as described by Gleerup et al. (2015) [6], in a calf diagnosed with polyarthritis. The facial expression undergoes different changes due to pain. Note the position of the ears, the tension of the facial muscles and muscles above the eyes, and the dilated nostrils. The picture was taken by the author at the Clinic for Ruminants with Amulatory and Herd Health Services, LMU Munich.

References

    1. Molony V. Comments on Anand and Craig. Pain. 1996;67:3–6. - PubMed
    1. Hudson C., Whay H., Huxley J. Recognition and management of pain in cattle. Practice. 2008;30:126–134. doi: 10.1136/inpract.30.3.126. - DOI
    1. Viñuela-Fernández I., Jones E., Welsh E.M., Fleetwood-Walker S.M. Pain mechanisms and their implication for the management of pain in farm and companion animals. Vet. J. 2007;174:227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Callaghan M.W. Lameness and associated pain in cattle-challenging traditional perceptions. Practice. 2002;24:2012–2019.
    1. McLennan K.M. Why Pain Is Still a Welfare Issue for Farm Animals, and How Facial Expression Could Be the Answer. Agriculture. 2018;8:127. doi: 10.3390/agriculture8080127. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources