Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation
- PMID: 33923312
- PMCID: PMC8146737
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050344
Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation
Abstract
Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients (p < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% (p = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.
Keywords: intravenous port; standard algorithm; totally implantable vascular access device.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(33):e1381. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001381. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26287429 Free PMC article.
-
[Clinical application of totally implantable central venous port].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;52(8):608-11. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25370762 Chinese.
-
Dual ultrasound-guided totally implantable venous access ports via the right internal jugular vein in pediatric patients with cancer: a preliminary experience in a single institution.World J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jun 29;6(3):e000509. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2022-000509. eCollection 2023. World J Pediatr Surg. 2023. PMID: 37396497 Free PMC article.
-
Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Aug;35(4):751-64. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0271-2. Epub 2011 Sep 16. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21922348 Review.
-
[Percutaneous interventional radiologic implantation of intravenous port-catheter systems].Radiologe. 1999 Sep;39(9):777-82. doi: 10.1007/s001170050575. Radiologe. 1999. PMID: 10525636 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Central venous catheterization: the cephalic vein access.Crit Care. 2022 Jun 8;26(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04031-y. Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 35676729 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series.EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023 Apr 11;59:2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.04.002. eCollection 2023. EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023. PMID: 37213486 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Iorio O., Gazzanelli S., D’Ermo G., Pezzolla A., Gurrado A., Testini M., De Toma G., Cavallaro G. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown. Am. Surg. 2018;84:841–843. doi: 10.1177/000313481808400629. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Plumhans C., Mahnken A.H., Ocklenburg C., Keil S., Behrendt F.F., Günther R.W., Schoth F. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: Catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. Eur. J. Radiol. 2011;79:338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources