Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 24;11(5):344.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11050344.

Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation

Affiliations

Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation

Ching-Feng Wu et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients (p < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% (p = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.

Keywords: intravenous port; standard algorithm; totally implantable vascular access device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard algorithm of intravenous port implantation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation trends of complication rate, incidence, and operation. (A) Variation trends of procedure- and catheter-related complication rates. (B) Variation trend of procedure- and catheter-related complication incidences. (C) Relative risk ratio between Year 2005 and Year 2018 cohorts. (D) Variation trend of operation time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seo T.-S., Song M.G., Kang E.-Y., Lee C.H., Yong H.S., Doo K. A Single-Incision Technique for Placement of Implantable Venous Access Ports via the Axillary Vein. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2014;25:1439–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.571. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iorio O., Gazzanelli S., D’Ermo G., Pezzolla A., Gurrado A., Testini M., De Toma G., Cavallaro G. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown. Am. Surg. 2018;84:841–843. doi: 10.1177/000313481808400629. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plumhans C., Mahnken A.H., Ocklenburg C., Keil S., Behrendt F.F., Günther R.W., Schoth F. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: Catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. Eur. J. Radiol. 2011;79:338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu C.-Y., Fu J.-Y., Feng P.-H., Kao T.-C., Yu S.-Y., Li H.-J., Ko P.-J., Hsieh H.-C. Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management. World J. Surg. 2011;35:2403–2410. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1200-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu C.-Y., Fu J.-Y., Feng P.-H., Liu Y.-H., Kao T.-C., Yu S.-Y., Ko P.-J., Hsieh H.-C. Risk Factors and Possible Mechanisms of Intravenous Port Catheter Migration. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012;44:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources