Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 16;10(8):1737.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10081737.

Methodological Aspects of Randomized Controlled Trials for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and How a Decision Support System Could Overcome Barriers

Dimitrios Kikidis  1 , Evgenia Vassou  1 , Winfried Schlee  2 , Eleftheria Iliadou  1 , Nikolaos Markatos  1 , Aikaterini Triantafyllou  1 , Berthold Langguth  2
Affiliations
Review

Methodological Aspects of Randomized Controlled Trials for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and How a Decision Support System Could Overcome Barriers

Dimitrios Kikidis et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Although a wide range of tinnitus management interventions is currently under research and a variety of therapeutic interventions have already been applied in clinical practice, no optimal and universal tinnitus treatment has been reached yet. This fact is to some extent a consequence of the high heterogeneity of the methodologies used in tinnitus related clinical studies. In this manuscript, we have identified, summarized, and critically appraised tinnitus-related randomized clinical trials since 2010, aiming at systematically mapping the research conducted in this area. The results of our analysis of the 73 included randomized clinical trials provide important insight on the identification of limitations of previous works, methodological pitfalls or gaps in current knowledge, a prerequisite for the adequate interpretation of current literature and execution of future studies.

Keywords: randomized controlled trial; tinnitus; tinnitus treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection PRISMA flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cima R.F.F., Mazurek B., Haider H., Kikidis D., Lapira A., Noreña A., Hoare D.J. A Multidisciplinary European Guideline for Tinnitus: Diagnostics, Assessment, and Treatment. HNO. 2019;67:10–42. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-0633-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Ridder D., Schlee W., Vanneste S., Londero A., Weisz N., Kleinjung T., Shekhawat G.S., Elgoyhen A.B., Song J.-J., Andersson G., et al. Chapter 1—Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal) In: Schlee W., Langguth B., Kleinjung T., Vanneste S., De Ridder D., editors. Progress in Brain Research. Volume 260. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. pp. 1–25. Tinnitus—An Interdisciplinary Approach Towards Individualized Treatment: From Heterogeneity to Personalized Medicine. - PubMed
    1. Cima R.F.F. Bothersome Tinnitus. HNO. 2018;66:369–374. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0502-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt J.M., Lin H.W., Bhattacharyya N. Tinnitus Epidemiology: Prevalence, Severity, Exposures And Treatment Patterns In The United States. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:959–965. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hesse G. Evidence and Evidence Gaps in Tinnitus Therapy. GMS Curr. Top. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016;15 doi: 10.3205/cto000131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources