Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 20;10(8):1783.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10081783.

Role of Proteasomes in Inflammation

Affiliations
Review

Role of Proteasomes in Inflammation

Carl Christoph Goetzke et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is involved in multiple cellular functions including the regulation of protein homeostasis, major histocompatibility (MHC) class I antigen processing, cell cycle proliferation and signaling. In humans, proteasome loss-of-function mutations result in autoinflammation dominated by a prominent type I interferon (IFN) gene signature. These genomic alterations typically cause the development of proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (PRAAS) by impairing proteasome activity and perturbing protein homeostasis. However, an abnormal increased proteasomal activity can also be found in other human inflammatory diseases. In this review, we cast a light on the different clinical aspects of proteasomal activity in human disease and summarize the currently studied therapeutic approaches.

Keywords: autoimmune; autoinflammation; inflammation; proteasome; proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of ubiquitylation and proteasomal protein degradation. (A) Proteins destined for proteasomal degradation are conjugated with ubiquitin in a three-step cascade. First, E1-ubiquitin-activating enzymes bind to ubiquitin in an ATP-dependent reaction. This ubiquitin is transferred onto a E2-ubiquitin conjugating-enzyme. The E3-ubiquitin-ligase binds to both ubiquitin-conjugated E2-enzymes and target substrates which thereby undergo modification with ubiquitin. Ubiquitylated proteins can be polyubiquitylated. Depicted is a K48 linked polyubiquitylation, where ubiquitin is consecutively attached to the lysine 48 of the already bound ubiquitin. (B) The 20S proteasome core particle is made up of α- and β-subunits. The assembly to αββα asymmetric heptameric rings is guided by assembly chaperones. Each 20S core particle consists of two outer α-rings and two inner β-rings. In standard proteasomes (SPs), the catalytically active subunits are β1, β2 and β5. In immunoproteasomes (IPs), these subunits are replaced by the inducible subunits LMP2 (β1i), MECL1 (β2i) and LMP7 (β5i). IPs are preferentially incorporated to newly synthetized proteasomes in response to IFN, as indicated. Additional isotypes include the thymoproteasome (TP) which contains a unique β5t protease subunit and the spermatoproteasome (SpP) that incorporates a specific structural α4s subunit. The active sites of the catalytic subunits face the inside of the 20S barrel shape. Proteasomes can bind to different regulators on one or both sides. The 19S regulator has receptors for poly-ubiquitylated proteins and helps to unfold the proteins, remove ubiquitin from substrates and translocate them into the 20S for degradation. The regulators can attach to different isoforms on either or both sides. Additionally, combinations of the 19S regulator and PA28αβ/γ or PA200 regulators exist.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Current understanding of the pathogenesis of UPS dysfunction in autoinflammatory diseases. PRAAS (Proteasome-Associated Autoinflammatory Syndrome): proteasome loss-of-function mutations decrease proteasome proteolytic activity and result in intracellular accumulation of polyubiquitylated proteins. These proteotoxic aggregates induce ER-stress which initiates the unfolded protein response (UPR). The IRE1 (inositol-requiring enzyme 1) arm of the UPR has been shown to contribute to the transcription of IFN-stimulated genes (ISG). A possible involvement of the integrated stress response (ISR) in this process is also discussed. NF-κB-mediated autoinflammation: PPR and cytokine receptor activation requires ubiquitylation for the induction of pro-inflammatory signaling. Depicted is the activation of the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR). The receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) binds to the activated TFNR and is ubiquitylated with linear (M1-linked) poly-ubiquitin chains by the LUBAC complex or with K63-linked polyubiquitin. Polyubiquitylation is counterbalanced by the deubiquitinating enzymes (DUB) OTULIN and A20 in order to control the activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pro-inflammatory pathways. USP18 deficiency: USP18 besides its DUB activity also directly regulates IFN signaling. It is upregulated following different pro-inflammatory stimuli and directly inhibits JAK1, thereby acting as a negative feedback loop. Disruption of this negative feedback leads to overwhelming inflammatory IFN response.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of the potential anti-inflammatory mechanisms of proteasome inhibitors. Proteasome inhibitors including bortezomib, carfilzomib, ONX 0914 and KZR 616 were shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects via different mechanisms. These involve all cells: an influence on MHC class I antigen presentation (top left) and degradation of IκBα (top right), which results in NF-κB nuclear translocation and transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Specific effects on cellular subsets include a targeted anti-inflammatory and proapoptotic effect on monocytes which results in a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine production upon TLR stimuli (bottom left). In T-cells, active IP are required for differentiation into Th1 and Th17 phenotypes (bottom center), whilst IP inhibition results in increased Treg differentiation and decreased IFN-γ production, as indicated. Plasma cells (PC) are especially sensitive to reduced proteasomal activity, which results in apoptosis most likely via activation of the UPR and in depletion of autoantibodies (bottom right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ciechanover A. Intracellular protein degradation: From a vague idea thru the lysosome and the ubiquitin–proteasome system and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1178–1190. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amm I., Sommer T., Wolf D.H. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: The role of the ubiquitin–proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1843:182–196. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pohl C., Dikic I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science. 2019;366:818–822. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3769. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warnatsch A., Bergann T., Krüger E. Oxidation matters: The ubiquitin proteasome system connects innate immune mechanisms with MHC class I antigen presentation. Mol. Immunol. 2013;55:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng C., Geetha T., Babu J.R. Failure of Ubiquitin Proteasome System: Risk for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Neurodegener. Dis. 2014;14:161–175. doi: 10.1159/000367694. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources