Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 13;26(8):2259.
doi: 10.3390/molecules26082259.

Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study

Affiliations

Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study

Ibraheem F Alshiddi et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

The fracture resistance of computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing CAD/CAM fabricated implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) is affected by the size/dimension and the micro cracks produced from diamond burs during the milling process. The present in vitro study investigated the fracture load for different cross-sectional dimensions of connector sites of implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) with different cantilever lengths (load point). A total of 48 ISCZFs (Cercon, Degudent; Dentsply, Deutschland, Germany) were fabricated by CAD/CAM and divided into four groups based on cantilever length and reinforcement of distal-abutment: Group A: 9 mm cantilever; Group B: 9 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment; Group C: 12 mm cantilever; Group D: 12 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment (n = 12). The ISCZFs were loaded using a universal testing machine for recording the fracture load. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey's test were used for the statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Significant variations were found between the fracture loads of the four ISCZFs (p = 0.000); Group-C and B were found with the weakest and the strongest distal cantilever frameworks with fracture load of 670.39 ± 130.96 N and 1137.86 ± 127.85 N, respectively. The mean difference of the fracture load between groups A (810.49 + 137.579 N) and B (1137.86 ± 127.85 N) and between C (670.39 ± 130.96 N) and D (914.58 + 149.635 N) was statistically significant (p = 0.000). Significant variations in the fracture load between the ISCZFs with different cantilever lengths and thicknesses of the distal abutments were found. Increasing the thickness of the distal abutment only by 0.5 mm reinforces the distal abutments by significantly increasing the fracture load of the ISCZFs. Therefore, an increase in the thickness of the distal abutments is recommended in patients seeking implant-supported distal cantilever fixed prostheses.

Keywords: dental prosthesis; fixed partial denture; implant-supported; zirconium; zirconium oxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of (A): Cantilever frameworks on 2 implant analogs; (B): Cantilever frameworks with reinforced distal abutment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Wax pattern of the cantilever design framework.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loading on the specimen using an Instron testing machine.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative scanning electron microscopic image showing the fractured specimen.

References

    1. Nistor L., Grădinaru M., Rîcă R., Mărășescu P., Stan M., Manolea H., Ionescu A., Moraru I. Zirconia Use in Dentistry—Manufacturing and Properties. Curr. Health Sci. J. 2019;45:28–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miyazaki T., Nakamura T., Matsumura H., Ban S., Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2013;57:236–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solá-Ruiz M.F., Leon-Martine R., Labaig-Rueda C., Selva-Otalaorrouchi E., Agustín-Panadero R. Clinical outcomes of veneered zirconia anterior partial fixed dental prostheses: A 12-year prospective clinical trial. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.046. in press. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solá-Ruiz M.F., Baixauli-López M., Roig-Vanaclocha A., Amengual-Lorenzo J., Agustín-Panadero R. Prospective study of monolithic zirconia crowns: Clinical behavior and survival rate at a 5-year follow-up. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2020 doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarone F., Russo S., Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: Clinical and experimental considerations. Dent. Mater. 2011;27:83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.024. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources