Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 28;13(5):783.
doi: 10.3390/v13050783.

CRISPR Interference Efficiently Silences Latent and Lytic Viral Genes in Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus-Infected Cells

Affiliations

CRISPR Interference Efficiently Silences Latent and Lytic Viral Genes in Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus-Infected Cells

Kevin Brackett et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Uncovering viral gene functions requires the modulation of gene expression through overexpression or loss-of-function. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), a modification of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, allows specific and efficient transcriptional silencing without genetic ablation. CRISPRi has been used to silence eukaryotic and prokaryotic genes at the single-gene and genome-wide levels. Here, we report the use of CRISPRi to silence latent and lytic viral genes, with an efficiency of ~80-90%, in epithelial and B-cells carrying multiple copies of the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) genome. Our results validate CRISPRi for the analysis of KSHV viral elements, providing a functional genomics tool for studying virus-host interactions.

Keywords: CRISPR-interference; KSHV; Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; dCas9-KRAB; gene expression; gene silencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Generation of iSLK-219-dC9K and BCBL-1-dC9K cell lines. (A) FACS traces showing mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of iSLK-219 and BCBL-1 cells transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing dCas9-KRAB-BFP-Blasticidin, selected with blasticidin for 10 days and sorted by FACS for BFP+ expression (P4 gate) (B) RT-qPCR showing silencing of ATF6 in BCBL-1 cells. BCBL-1-dC9K cells were transduced with an ATF6 sgRNA targeting vector and selected with puromycin for 10 days. 28S rRNA was used as a loading control. Error bars: standard deviation (C) immunoblot showing silencing of PERK 10 days after iSLK-219 cells were transduced with a PERK sgRNA targeting vector and selected by FACS (BFP+).
Figure 2
Figure 2
CRISPRi silencing of KSHV-encoded EGFP. (A) Region of the viral genome encoding EGFP and position of the sgRNA. (B) Flow cytometry analysis (MFI) of iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with sgRNAs targeting EGFP or non-targeting (NT) sgRNAs. Note the downregulation of EGFP expression in cells transduced with the targeting sgRNA. (C) Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy analyses of paraformaldehyde-fixed, BFP expressing cells (sgRNA), EGFP and LANA in iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with sgRNAs targeting EGFP or non-targeting (NT) sgRNAs. Quantification of LANA puncta/Cell in four independent fields (t-Test, ns p = 0.15).
Figure 3
Figure 3
CRISPRi silencing of latent genes in iSLK-219 cells. (A) Region of the viral genome encoding LANA (ORF73) and position of the sgRNA. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LANA in iSLK-219 cells, and iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or a LANA specific sgRNA. Image representative of three biological replicates. Bars: quantification of the data. (one-way ANOVA, **** p < 0.0001). Error bars: standard deviation, ns, not significant. (C) Immunofluorescence analyses of LANA in methanol-fixed iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a LANA specific sgRNA. Image representative of three biological replicates. (D) Flow cytometry analyses (MFI) of iSLK-219 (blue trace), or iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA (yellow trace) or a LANA specific sgRNA (red trace). Note the downregulation of EGFP expression in cells where LANA has been silenced. Image representative of two biological replicates.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CRISPRi silencing of immediate–early genes in iSLK-219 cells. Immunoblot analysis of (A) ORF57 (one-way ANOVA, 24 h **** p < 0.001, 48 h * p value 0.025), (B) K8.1 (one-way ANOVA, 48 h *** p < 0.001) and (D) LANA (Kruskal–Wallis test, 0.99 < p < 0.3) in latent and lytic (24 and 48 h post-reactivation) iSLK-219 cells, and iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or an ORF57-specific sgRNA. Image representative of three biological replicates. Bars: quantification of the data. Error bars: standard deviation, ns, not significant. (C) Quantification of viral titers (IU, infectious units) in the filtered supernatant of iSLK-219 or iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or an ORF57-specific sgRNA, collected at 72 h post-reactivation. Error bars: standard deviation. (one-way ANOVA, **** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
CRISPRi silencing of delayed-early genes in iSLK-219 cells. (A) Region of the viral genome encoding ORF59 and position of the sgRNAs. Immunoblot analysis of (A) ORF59, and (B) K8.1 (in latent and lytic (96 h post-reactivation) in iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or an ORF59-specific sgRNA. Image representative of three biological replicates. Bars: quantification of the data. Error bars: standard deviation (one-way ANOVA, **** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.001). (C) Quantification of viral titers (IU, infectious units) in the filtered supernatant of iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or ORF59-specific sgRNAs, collected at 72 and 96 h post-reactivation. Error bars: standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
CRISPRi silencing of latent genes in BCBL-1 cells. (A) Region of the viral genome encoding LANA (ORF73) and position of the sgRNAs. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LANA in iSLK-219 cells, and iSLK-219-dC9K cells transduced with a non-targeting (NT) sgRNA or a LANA specific sgRNA. Image representative of three biological replicates. (C) Quantification of the immunoblot data for sgRNAs that silenced LANA. Error bars: standard deviation (one-way ANOVA, *** p = 0.0004, ** p = 0.004, * p = 0.0124, ns, not significant).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dissinger N.J., Damania B. Recent Advances in Understanding Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus. F1000Research. 2016;5:740. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7612.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Globocan 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. World Health Organisation (WHO); Geneva, Switzerland: 2015.
    1. Mesri E.A., Cesarman E., Boshoff C. Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Its Associated Herpesvirus. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:707–719. doi: 10.1038/nrc2888. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. What Are the Key Statistics about Kaposi Sarcoma? American Cancer Society; Burlington, VT, USA: 2016.
    1. Arias C., Weisburd B., Stern-Ginossar N., Mercier A., Madrid A.S., Bellare P., Holdorf M., Weissman J.S., Ganem D. KSHV 2.0: A Comprehensive Annotation of the Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Genome Using Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Novel Genomic and Functional Features. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003847. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003847. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources