Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 28;10(5):971.
doi: 10.3390/foods10050971.

Microbes: Food for the Future

Affiliations
Review

Microbes: Food for the Future

Matilde Ciani et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing scarcity of natural resources and climate change. Disrupting technologies are urgently needed to improve the efficiency of the food production system and to reduce the negative externalities of agriculture (soil erosion, desertification, air pollution, water and soil contamination, biodiversity loss, etc.). Among the most innovative technologies, the production of microbial protein (MP) in controlled and intensive systems called "bioreactors" is receiving increasing attention from research and industry. MP has low arable land requirements, does not directly compete with crop-based food commodities, and uses fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency. This review considers the potential and limitations of four MP sources currently tested at pilot level or sold as food or feed ingredients: hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (HOB), methanotrophs, fungi, and microalgae (cyanobacteria). The environmental impacts (energy, land, water use, and GHG emissions) of these MP sources are compared with those of plant, animal, insect, and cultured meat-based proteins. Prices are reported to address whether MP may compete with traditional protein sources. Microalgae cultivation under artificial light is discussed as a strategy to ensure independence from weather conditions, continuous operation over the year, as well as high-quality biomass. The main challenges to the spreading of MP use are discussed.

Keywords: HOB; cyanobacteria; methanotrophs; microalgae cultivation with artificial light; microbial protein; mycoprotein; yeasts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fluxes of nutrients, water, electric and chemical energy, organic and inorganic carbon from agriculture (above) and megacities (below) wastes to microbial protein production.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Green Wall Panels® (Fotosintetica & Microbiologica S.r.l.—Florence, Italy) illuminated by LED (Courtesy of Azienda Agricola Serenissima—Padova, Italy).

References

    1. Pikaar I., Matassa S., Bodirsky B.L., Weindl I., Humpenöder F., Rabaey K., Boon N., Bruschi M., Yuan Z., va Zanten H., et al. Decoupling livestock from land use through industrial feed production pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:7351–7359. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FAO . The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, Italy: 2017. [(accessed on 16 May 2020)]. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6881e.pdf.
    1. Searchinger T., Hanson C., Ranganathan J., Lipinski B., Waite R., Winterbottom R., Dinshaw A., Heimlich R. Creating a Sustainable Food Future. A Menu of Solutions to Sustainably Feed More Than 9 Billion People by 2050. World Resources Institute; Washington, DC, USA: 2014. World Resources Report 2013-14: Interim Findings;
    1. Springmann M., Clark M., Mason-D’Croz D., Wiebe K., Bodirsky B.L., de Vries W.L., Vermeulen S.J., Herrero M., Carlson K.M., Jonell M., et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562:519–525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin F.S., Lambin E.F., Lenton T.M., Scheffer M., Folke C., Schellnhuber H.J., et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009;461:472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources