Gait speed and adverse outcomes following hospitalised exacerbation of COPD
- PMID: 33926974
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04047-2020
Gait speed and adverse outcomes following hospitalised exacerbation of COPD
Abstract
Background: The 4-m gait speed (4MGS) test is a simple physical performance measure and surrogate marker of frailty that is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults. We aimed to assess the ability of 4MGS to predict prognosis in patients hospitalised with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).
Methods: 213 participants hospitalised with AECOPD (52% male, mean age 72 years and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 35% predicted) were enrolled. 4MGS and baseline demographics were recorded at hospital discharge. All-cause readmission and mortality were collected for 1 year after discharge and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed. Kaplan-Meier and competing risks analyses were conducted comparing time to all-cause readmission and mortality between 4MGS quartiles.
Results: 111 participants (52%) were readmitted and 35 (16%) died during the follow-up period. 4MGS was associated with all-cause readmission, with an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.868 (95% CI 0.797-0.945; p=0.001) per 0.1 m·s-1 increase in gait speed, and with all-cause mortality, with an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.747 (95% CI 0.622-0.898; p=0.002) per 0.1 m·s-1 increase in gait speed. Readmission and mortality models incorporating 4MGS had higher discrimination than age or FEV1 % pred alone, with areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of 0.73 and 0.80, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and competing risks curves demonstrated that those in slower gait speed quartiles had reduced time to readmission and mortality (log-rank, both p<0.001).
Conclusions: 4MGS provides a simple means of identifying at-risk patients with COPD at hospital discharge. This provides valuable information to plan post-discharge care and support.
Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: R.E. Barker has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.S.C. Kon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.E. Jones has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Banya has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.M. Nolan reports personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Patel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O. Polgar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B.M. Haselden has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.I. Polkey reports personal fees for consultancy from Philips and JFD, grants from GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Cullinan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W.D-C. Man reports grants from the Medical Research Council UK, during the conduct of the study; grants from the National Institute for Health Research, British Lung Foundation and Pfizer, personal fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Mundipharma and Novartis, nonfinancial support from GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.A. Walsh has nothing to disclose.
Comment in
-
Reply to: Room for methodological improvement in gait speed study for COPD patients.Eur Respir J. 2021 Dec 2;58(6):2101796. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01796-2021. Print 2021 Dec. Eur Respir J. 2021. PMID: 34413149 No abstract available.
-
Room for methodological improvement in gait speed study for COPD patients.Eur Respir J. 2021 Dec 2;58(6):2101445. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01445-2021. Print 2021 Dec. Eur Respir J. 2021. PMID: 34413150 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical