Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice
- PMID: 33927805
- PMCID: PMC8046893
- DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00328-8
Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgeries is increasing and so is the number of revision surgeries for a failed ACLR. The spectrum of ACL failure includes symptoms of recurrent instability, pain, and/or stiffness.
Discussion: Factors contributing to ACL failure may be classified as patient-related, surgeon-related, and biological factors. Of these, tunnel malposition and recurrent trauma are the most common causes. Detailed patient assessment, imaging, and studying details of the index surgery are critical prior to planning revision surgery. Infection has to be ruled out prior to planning any reconstructive surgical procedure. Osseous malalignment in the coronal or sagittal planes would also need correction along with or prior to revision ACL surgery. Revision ACL reconstruction maybe performed as a one-stage or two-stage procedure. Severe tunnel dilatation, infection, or arthrofibrosis necessitates a two-stage approach. Autografts are preferred for revision ACL due their lesser re-tear rates and better outcomes. Associated meniscus tears and cartilage injuries are more common in revision than in primary surgery and need to be managed appropriately. Extra-articular reconstruction for controlling anterolateral instability is frequently required as well.
Conclusion: Revision ACL reconstruction is a complex undertaking due to limited graft options, compromised anatomy and high frequency of associated injuries. Patient expectations must be tempered because functional outcomes and return to pre-injury sports are inferior to a primary surgery.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Autograft; One-stage reconstruction; Posterior tibial slope; Re-tear; Revision; Tunnel dilatation; Tunnel malposition; Two-stage reconstruction.
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestSachin Tapasvi and Anshu Shekhar declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures








References
-
- Lien-Iversen T, Morgan DB, Jensen C, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Viberg B. Does surgery reduce knee osteoarthritis, meniscal injury and subsequent complications compared with non-surgery after ACL rupture with at least 10 years follow-up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;54(10):592–598. - PubMed
-
- Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2001;83(8):1131–1143. - PubMed
-
- Johnson DL, Fu FH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Why do failures occur? Instructional Course Lectures. 1995;44:391–406. - PubMed
-
- Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB. Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012;40(7):1551–1557. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources