Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital
- PMID: 3392811
Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital
Abstract
Decisions to limit care for terminally ill patients present a number of ethical and legal issues. For the past 13 years, the Optimum Care Committee (OCC) of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, has provided advice for physicians faced with such issues. I have reviewed the experience of the committee with the 73 cases on which it provided consultation from 1974 through 1986. In addition, I have compared these cases with those of all 113 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital who were accorded do-not-resuscitate status without OCC input during a three-month period and found that the two groups differed significantly on a number of clinical variables. I have also found that the OCC cases fall into six categories, each of which presents different ethical and legal issues. In addition, the use of the OCC within the hospital is increasing especially with regard to certain categories of cases. The committee has dealt with controversial issues in a consistent and ethically forthright manner, but legal and moral questions remain. More discussion of the role of ethics committees in withdrawal-of-care cases is needed.
KIE: In this study of ethics committee functioning, the medical records of every consultation completed in the years 1974-1986 by Massachusetts General Hospital's Optimum Care Committee (OCC) were reviewed. These 73 cases were then compared with the records of 113 patients who were coded do-not-resuscitate (DNR) at Massachusetts General in 1986-1987 without consultation by the OCC. The 73 OCC consultations, five of which are presented here, were classified by Brennan into six broad categories on the basis of the decision made by the committee and the attending physician. Many of these cases involved incompetent patients. Brennan comments that consultation with the OCC is increasing, and that the committee has consistently applied ethical principles, particularly the concept of beneficence, to difficult and sometimes controversial cases.
Similar articles
-
Incompetent patients with limited care in the absence of family consent. A study of socioeconomic and clinical variables.Ann Intern Med. 1988 Nov 15;109(10):819-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-10-819. Ann Intern Med. 1988. PMID: 3190030
-
Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):233-7. JAMA. 1986. PMID: 3723709
-
Hospital ethics committees. Administrative aspects.JAMA. 1985 May 10;253(18):2687-92. JAMA. 1985. PMID: 3989944
-
Do-not-resuscitate orders. Time for reappraisal in long-term-care institutions.JAMA. 1988 Oct 14;260(14):2098-101. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.14.2098. JAMA. 1988. PMID: 3138439 Review.
-
Ethics committees in critical care.Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):111-21. Crit Care Clin. 1986. PMID: 3331303 Review.
Cited by
-
Advance directives: the views of health care professionals.CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1331-8. CMAJ. 1993. PMID: 8462055 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' access to ethics support services in four European countries.Health Care Anal. 2007 Dec;15(4):321-35. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0072-6. Health Care Anal. 2007. PMID: 17943449
-
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?HEC Forum. 1994 May;6(3):176-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01463652. HEC Forum. 1994. PMID: 10135103
-
Advance directives outside the USA: are they the best solution everywhere?Theor Med. 1997 Sep;18(3):283-301. doi: 10.1023/a:1005765528043. Theor Med. 1997. PMID: 9271918
-
Hospital ethics committees: a survey in Upstate New York.HEC Forum. 2006 Sep;18(3):222-44. doi: 10.1007/s10730-006-9009-y. HEC Forum. 2006. PMID: 17650761
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous