Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0243953.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243953. eCollection 2021.

Effects of rumen-protected methionine supplementation on the performance of high production dairy cows in the tropics

Affiliations

Effects of rumen-protected methionine supplementation on the performance of high production dairy cows in the tropics

Valdir Chiogna Junior et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Increasing methionine availability in dairy cow diets during the first third of lactation may enhance their performance and health. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine (Smartamine® M, SM) in a lactation diet with protein and energy levels calculated according to the literature. Seventy-six multiparous Holstein cows (39.1 ± 6.8 kg of milk/d and 65 ± 28 DIM) were assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments (38/treatment) according to a randomized complete block design with a 2-wk (covariate) and 10-wk experimental period. Treatments were a basal diet (CON; 3.77 Lys:1Met); and CON + 23 g SM (2.97 Lys:1 Met). Individual milk samples were taken every 2 weeks to determine milk composition. Blood was collected from 24 cows on d+30 d to measure plasma AA levels. Body weight and body condition score (BCS) were measured at the beginning and the end of the experiment. The SM diet promoted higher milk yield (41.7 vs. 40.1 kg/d; P = 0.03). Energy-corrected milk yield (41.0 vs. 38.0 kg/d), milk protein yield (1.30 vs. 1.18 kg/d), milk protein (3.14% vs. 2.97%) and casein (2.39% vs. 2.28%) were also different (P < 0.01) as well as milk fat yield (1.42 vs. 1.29 kg/d; P = 0.02). A trend (P = 0.06) for higher milk fat % (3.41% vs. 3.21%) was observed. Both diets resulted in similar body weight, but CON-fed cows tended (P = 0.08) to have higher BCS. Higher plasma methionine levels were determined with SM compared with CON (29.6 vs. 18.4 μM; P < 0.01), but lysine and histidine were not different. Dietary supplementation of RPM improved productive performance by increasing milk yield and milk components yields, suggesting better dietary AA utilization when Met levels are adjusted in Lys-adequate lactation diets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Fernanda Lopes is an employee of Adisseo SA Inc. and Dr. Charles G. Schwab works for Schwab Consulting LLC. Other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Effect of dietary RPMet supplementation on milk yield compared with the control diet.
Values are expressed in average weekly milk yield (kg/d).

References

    1. Zanton GI. Protein and amino acid nutrition. In Beede DK, editor. Large Dairy Herd Management. Third edition. Champaign Il: American Dairy Science Association; 2017. pp. 625–637.
    1. Schwab CG, Broderick GA. A 100-Year Review: Protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:10094–112. 10.3168/jds.2017-13320 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nan X, Bu D, Li X, Wang J, Wei H, Hu H, et al.. Ratio of lysine to methionine alters expression of genes involved in milk protein transcription and translation and mTOR phosphorylation in bovine mammary cells. Physiol Genomics. 2014; 46: 268–275. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00119.2013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7h ed. Washington DC: National Research Council National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Amburgh ME Van, Collao-Saenz EA, Higgs RJ, Ross DA, Recktenwald EB, Raffrenato E, et al.. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 6361–6380. 10.3168/jds.2015-9378 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types