Management of insecticides for use in disease vector control: Lessons from six countries in Asia and the Middle East
- PMID: 33930033
- PMCID: PMC8115796
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009358
Management of insecticides for use in disease vector control: Lessons from six countries in Asia and the Middle East
Abstract
Interventions to control the vectors of human diseases, notably malaria, leishmaniasis and dengue, have relied mainly on the action of chemical insecticides. However, concerns have been raised regarding the management of insecticides in vector-borne disease-endemic countries. Our study aimed to analyze how vector control insecticides are managed in selected countries to extract lessons learned. A qualitative analysis of the situation of vector control insecticides management was conducted in six countries. Multi-stakeholder meetings and key informer interviews were conducted on aspects covering the pesticide lifecycle. Findings were compared and synthesized to extract lessons learned. Centrally executed guidelines and standards on the management of insecticides offered direction and control in most malaria programs, but were largely lacking from decentralized dengue programs, where practices of procurement, application, safety, storage, and disposal were variable between districts. Decentralized programs were better at facilitating participation of stakeholders and local communities and securing financing from local budgets. However, little coordination existed between malaria, visceral leishmaniasis and dengue programs within countries. Entomological capacity was concentrated in malaria programs at central level, while dengue and visceral leishmaniasis programs were missing out on expertise. Monitoring systems for insecticide resistance in malaria vectors were rarely used for dengue or visceral leishmaniasis vectors. Strategies for insecticide resistance management, where present, did not extend across programs or sectors in most countries. Dengue programs in most countries continued to rely on space spraying which, considering the realities on the ground, call for revision of international guidelines. Vector control programs in the selected countries were confronted with critical shortcomings in the procurement, application, safety measures, storage, and disposal of vector control insecticides, with implications for the efficiency, effectiveness, and safety of vector control. Further international support is needed to assist countries in situation analysis, action planning and development of national guidelines on vector control insecticide management.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- WHO. Global vector control response 2017–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
-
- Kyu HH, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al.. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1859–922. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Townson H, Nathan MB, Zaim M, Guillet P, Manga L, Bos R, et al.. Exploiting the potential of vector control for disease prevention. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(12):942–7. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCEnglish. doi: /S0042-96862005001200017 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
