Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250877.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250877. eCollection 2021.

Predictors of drug survival for biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis from the TRA Clinical Electronic Registry

Affiliations

Predictors of drug survival for biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis from the TRA Clinical Electronic Registry

Ching-Tsai Lin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In this study we aimed to identify the predictors of drug survival for biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting. Data from RA patients receiving bDMARDs and tsDMARDs between 2007 and 2019 were extracted from the Taiwan Rheumatology Association Clinical Electronic Registry (TRACER). Patients were categorized into tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, non-TNF-α inhibitors, and tofacitinib groups. The primary outcome was 3-year drug retention and the causes of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs discontinuation were recorded. Baseline demographic data before the initiation of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs treatment were analyzed to identify the predictors of 3-year drug survival. A total of 1,270 RA patients were recruited (TNF-α inhibitors: 584; non-TNF-α inhibitors: 535; tofacitinib: 151). The independent protective factors for 3-year drug survival were positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.85, p = 0.013) and biologics-naïve RA (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.94, p = 0.024). In contrast, positive anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.32-3.79, p = 0.003) and pre-existing latent tuberculosis (HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.06-4.09, p<0.001) were associated with drug discontinuation. RA patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors exhibited better drug retention, especially in the biologics-naïve subgroup (p = 0.037). TNF-α inhibitors were associated with lower cumulative incidence of discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events (both p<0.001). Baseline RF and ACPA positivity in abatacept-treated patients were associated with a better 3-year drug survival. However, negative ACPA levels predicted superior drug survival of TNF-α inhibitors and tofacitinib. In conclusion, bio-naïve status predicted better drug survival in TNF-α inhibitors-treated RA patients. RF and ACPA positivity predicted better abatacept drug survival. In contrast, ACPA negativity was associated with superior TNF-α inhibitors and tofacitinib survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The 3-year drug retention probability of TNF-α inhibitors, non-TNF-α inhibitors, and tofacitinib in (A) all, (B) biologics-naïve, (C) biologics-experienced RA patients by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Pairwise comparison (A) all p<0.001, (B) TNF-α inhibitors vs. non-TNF-α inhibitors, p = 0.010; TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib & non-TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib, p>0.05 (C) all p>0.05.
Fig 2
Fig 2
The 3-year cumulative incidences of TNF-α inhibitors, non-TNF-α inhibitors, and tofacitinib, (A) Discontinued due to inefficacy, and (B) Discontinued due to adverse event by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Pairwise comparison (A) TNF-α inhibitors vs. non-TNF-α inhibitors, p<0.001; TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib, p = 0.001; non-TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib, p>0.05, (B) TNF-α inhibitors vs. non-TNF-α inhibitors, p = 0.014; TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib & non-TNF-α inhibitors vs. tofacitinib, p<0.001.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The 3-year Kaplan-Meier drug retention probability of TNF-α inhibitors (A, B), abatacept (C, D), tocilizumab (E,F), rituximab (G, H), and tofacitinib (I, J) by RF and ACPA positivity. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; RF, rheumatoid factor; ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibody.

References

    1. See LC, Kuo CF, Chou IJ, Chiou MJ, Yu KH. Sex- and age-specific incidence of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in the Chinese population: a Taiwan population-based study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43:381–6. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.06.001 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr., Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC et al.. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1–26. 10.1002/art.39480 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A et al.. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–99. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review. Jama. 2018;320:1360–72. 10.1001/jama.2018.13103 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:276–89. 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.8 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms