Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;36(4):850-858.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01522-0. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Manchester COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES)

Rahul Kanabar et al. Eye (Lond). 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Pressure on capacity in ophthalmology alongside the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to the development of the COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service (CUES), allowing patients to receive a prompt ophthalmic consultation, including remotely. The aim of this study was to conduct a service evaluation of CUES in Manchester.

Methods: Data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from both primary and secondary care over an 8-week period from June to August 2020.

Results: In primary care CUES in Greater Manchester (GM) 2461 patients were assessed, with a majority self-referring to the service (68.7%, n = 1844). 91.7% of cases initially screened for CUES were deemed eligible and given a telemedicine appointment in GM; 53.3% of these cases required face-to-face consultation. 14.3% of cases seen within in GM CUES (351 out of 2461) were provisionally referred to secondary care. Contemporaneously the main provider emergency eyecare department (EED) attendances were reduced by 37.7% per month between April and December 2020 inclusive, compared to the same months in 2019. Patients attending a CUES face-to-face assessment were more likely to have a diagnosis in agreement with secondary care, compared to patients referred in from telemedicine assessment only (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: This evaluation of CUES demonstrates a high level of primary care activity alongside a sustained reduction in EED cases. The case-mix of patients seen within EED following referral appears to be of a less benign nature than those cases seen prior to the introduction of CUES.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

WC and RR are Clinical Governance Leads and MJ Chief Finance Officer at Primary Eyecare Services who hold the contract with Manchester CCG in relation to CUES and other primary care optometry delivered services.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Summary clinical pathway for the Manchester CUES.
F2F: Face to face consultation; GOS: General Ophthalmic Services; Level 2 optometrist has the Independent Prescribing, IP, qualification.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Flowchart depicting primary care data.
Flowchart depicting primary care data for a GM CUES and b Manchester and Trafford CUES. a A breakdown of the primary care data at each stage for CUES in GM. b A breakdown of the primary care data at each stage for CUES in Manchester and Trafford. *Figures for outcomes of telemedicine assessments may not tally precisely due to selected patients having more than one follow-up appointment post face-to-face assessment or post OCT assessment. CUES COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service, GOS General Ophthalmic Services, GP General Practitioner, IP Independent Prescribing, OCT Optical Coherence Tomography, HES Hospital Eyecare Services.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Flowchart for the pathway of the 98* (of 101) provisional CUES referrals received by MREH EED over the course of an 8-week period between June 2020 and August 2020.
A breakdown of the primary care data at each stage of the process is reflected for Manchester CUES. *3 provisional referral forms could not be attained. CUES COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service, DOS Directory of Service, OCT Optical Coherence Tomography, MREH Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, HES Hospital Eyecare Services.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Graph displaying a summary of the number of MREH EED attendances from 2019 to 2020.
The months of the year are listed on the horizontal axis. The total number of EED attendances is listed on the vertical axis. The percentage change from 2019 to 2020 for each month is displayed. EED: Emergency Eye Department.

References

    1. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. The way forward. London; 2015. p. 2. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-For....
    1. NHS England, Local Optical Committee Support Unit, Clinical Council for Eye Health Commissioning. CUES: COVID-19 Urgent Eye Care Service: patient pathway. 2020.
    1. Harper RA, Dhawahir-Scala F, Wilson H, Gunn PJG, Jinkinson M, Pretty IA, et al. Development and implementation of a Greater Manchester COVID19 Urgent Eyecare Service. Eye. 2020. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41433-020-1042-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harper RA, Gunn PJG, Spry PGD, Fenerty CH, Lawrenson JG. Care pathways for glaucoma detection and monitoring in the UK. Eye. 2020;34:89–102. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0667-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primary Eyecare Services. Minor eye conditions service (MECS) pathway & protocols. 2019. p. 6. https://hampshireloc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/MECS-Pathway-Prot....